Exam practice

Why did I lose the mark?

Every entry below is a realistic student answer that scores badly, the precise reason it loses marks, and the version that scores. Read these before your exam — recognising your own habit here is worth more than another hour of reading notes.

Natural Resources

A student wrote · Formation of RocksA student classified limestone as impermeable, writing: 'Limestone is a hard, solid rock, so water cannot pass through it.'
Why it loses marksHow strong a rock looks has nothing to do with permeability. Permeability depends on whether there are connected pore spaces, joints and bedding planes for water to travel through, and limestone has all three.
The answer that scoresLimestone is permeable. Water passes through the pore spaces between the grains and along the joints and bedding planes, and because the weak acid in rainwater slowly dissolves the calcium carbonate, those cracks are widened into channels and caves over time. That is why rivers disappear into sinkholes and springs emerge further down the valley in limestone country, and why a village well in limestone can be polluted very quickly.
Revise this topicFormation of Rocks
A student wrote · Formation of RocksA student wrote: 'Weathering is when the river carries the broken rock away and erosion happens when the material is dropped.'
Why it loses marksThree different processes have been mixed up. Weathering happens where the rock lies and involves no movement, erosion is the removal of the broken material by a moving agent, and dropping the load is deposition.
The answer that scoresWeathering is the breakdown of rock in place, by freezing and thawing, by plant roots or by chemical reactions such as the solution of calcium carbonate in weak acid. Erosion is the wearing away and removal of that material by a moving agent such as a river, a glacier, the wind or the waves. Deposition is when the agent loses energy and drops the load, and the sediment then settles and accumulates as sedimentation.
Revise this topicFormation of Rocks
A student wrote · Formation of RocksA student wrote: 'Marble forms from shale and slate forms from limestone, when they are heated and squeezed.'
Why it loses marksThe pairs have been reversed. Marble is the metamorphic form of limestone, which is a carbonate rock, and slate is the metamorphic form of shale or mudstone, which is a clay rock.
The answer that scoresLimestone is changed by heat and pressure into marble, as the calcium carbonate recrystallises into interlocking calcite crystals; this is why marble contains no fossils. Shale or mudstone is changed at lower heat and pressure into slate, as the plate-like clay minerals recrystallise in alignment, which is why slate splits into thin sheets that are good for roofing.
Revise this topicFormation of Rocks
A student wrote · Formation of RocksA student wrote: 'Basalt has large crystals because it has been in the ground longer and had more time to grow them.'
Why it loses marksHow long ago the rock formed does not matter; what matters is how long the molten rock took to cool. Basalt is lava that cooled quickly at the surface, so its crystals are tiny, and the age of the rock has no effect on crystal size.
The answer that scoresBasalt is extrusive: the lava erupted at the surface, where it lost heat quickly, so there was little time for crystals to grow and the rock is fine-grained. Granite is intrusive: the magma was insulated by the rock around it and cooled slowly, so its crystals grew large enough to be seen with the naked eye. Slow cooling gives large crystals, fast cooling gives small crystals.
Revise this topicFormation of Rocks
A student wrote · Extraction of Rocks, Ores and MineralsA student wrote: 'An ore is any rock that contains a metal.'
Why it loses marksAlmost every rock contains traces of metal, so this definition would make the whole crust an ore. What turns metal-bearing rock into an ore is that the metal can be extracted at a profit, which depends on the ore grade and on the price the metal will fetch.
The answer that scoresAn ore is rock containing minerals and metals in a concentration high enough for the metal to be extracted at a profit. Rock carrying only a trace of metal is not an ore, and rock that is economic today becomes waste if the metal price falls.
A student wrote · Extraction of Rocks, Ores and MineralsA student wrote: 'An opencast mine damages only the land that is dug out, because the pit is the only part of the site that is disturbed.'
Why it loses marksThe pit is only part of the footprint. Overburden and waste rock are stored in spoil heaps, tailings go into dams, and haul roads, conveyors, buildings and the processing plant cover more land again. Dust, blasting noise and vibration, pumped groundwater and acid drainage all affect land well beyond the working face.
The answer that scoresA surface mine disturbs the pit itself, the spoil heaps, the tailings dam, the processing plant, the haul roads and the land under the rail or conveyor link, and it lowers the water table and spreads dust and noise for kilometres around. That is why an environmental impact assessment covers a much wider area than the orebody.
A student wrote · Extraction of Rocks, Ores and MineralsA student wrote: 'Restoring a mine means putting the land back exactly as it was before mining started.'
Why it loses marksComplete restoration is rarely possible. The soil structure and seed bank have been destroyed, the rock has been broken, mixed and possibly enriched in metals, the drainage has changed and the shape of the land is different. Restoration produces land that is stable, safe and productive again, not a copy of the original ecosystem.
The answer that scoresRestoration makes the land stable, safe and usable again by replacing the overburden, re-grading the slopes, improving the soil with lime, fertiliser and organic matter, planting trees and preventing acid drainage. It rarely recreates the original habitat, and because it takes decades and must be paid for after the mine has closed, permission is usually tied to a restoration bond or to restoring the site in stages.
A student wrote · Extraction of Rocks, Ores and MineralsA student wrote: 'Phytomining and bioleaching are used instead of opencast mining because they are quicker and they work on any ore.'
Why it loses marksThey are far slower than conventional mining and they only work on low-grade material and on a few metals. Bioleaching needs the right bacteria with warm, wet, aerated conditions and takes months; phytomining needs a large area of land for a very small yield of metal. Their real advantage is that they recover metal from waste without removing the rock.
The answer that scoresThese methods are chosen where conventional mining would not pay - spoil heaps, tailings, low-grade ore and contaminated ground - because the metal is too thinly spread to dig, crush and process at a profit. Bioleaching uses bacteria that dissolve the metal into a solution over months, and phytomining uses hyperaccumulator plants that are harvested and burned so that the metal can be recovered from the ash. Both are slow, both produce acid that must be contained, and neither can replace a large open pit for a rich deposit.
A student wrote · Sustainable Management of Rocks, Ores and MineralsA student wrote: 'A finite resource is one that will never run out, because it is replaced by nature as we use it.'
Why it loses marksThis reverses the definition. Finite means the opposite: the resource is used up at a faster rate than it is replaced, so the amount available is shrinking. Confusing finite with renewable loses the definition mark and undermines every later answer about depletion.
The answer that scoresA finite resource is a natural resource that is used up at a faster rate than it is replaced. Rocks, ores and minerals are finite because new ore bodies are formed by geological processes over millions of years, while a single mine can extract a deposit in a few decades. The rate of use is therefore far higher than the rate of replacement, so the total supply is fixed.
A student wrote · Sustainable Management of Rocks, Ores and MineralsA student wrote: 'Recycling means we do not need to worry about running out of metal, because all metal can be recycled again and again.'
Why it loses marksRecycling helps, but it cannot close the loop completely. Collection and sorting never capture all scrap, some metal is lost as residues, mixed alloys have to be downcycled, and demand is growing as population and wealth rise. This answer also ignores the strategies above recycling in the hierarchy.
The answer that scoresRecycling extends the life of a reserve, because it supplies metal without mining new ore, and metals keep their properties through repeated recycling. It cannot supply everything, however: some metal is lost at every stage, alloys are hard to separate, and collection only works where there is infrastructure and a market. Demand for metals such as copper and lithium is rising, so reduce, reuse and substitution are needed as well, since those strategies avoid extraction altogether.
A student wrote · Sustainable Management of Rocks, Ores and MineralsA student wrote: 'If a country passes a law banning illegal mining, the illegal mining will stop, because companies have to obey the law.'
Why it loses marksThis treats legislation as if it enforced itself. Enforcement is a separate stage that needs funding, trained inspectors, monitoring, meaningful penalties and honest officials, and it fails where local people depend on the illegal income.
The answer that scoresLegislation sets the rules and enforcement makes them work. In Ghana, illegal small-scale gold mining polluted the Pra and Ankobra rivers despite the law; a ban and a task force reduced it but did not stop it, because thousands of people depended on the income, the sites were remote and equipment could be moved. Effective enforcement needs inspectors, monitoring, fines that are larger than the profit from breaking the law, and alternative livelihoods for the people affected.
A student wrote · Sustainable Management of Rocks, Ores and MineralsA student wrote: 'Once a mine has been restored, nothing has been lost, because the land and the ore have both been put back.'
Why it loses marksRestoration repairs the land, but it cannot recreate an ore body. Metals are concentrated by geological processes over millions of years, so the ore that has been removed is gone for any timescale that matters to people. Restored land also differs from the original - the soil structure and drainage are hard to rebuild and biodiversity takes decades to return.
The answer that scoresRestoration replaces the overburden, improves the soil, uses bioremediation and plants trees, and the site can be repurposed as a lake, landfill, recreation ground or nature reserve, so future generations inherit usable land instead of a hazard. The ore itself is not replaced: it was formed over millions of years and has been extracted and dispersed. That is why restoration must be combined with reduce, reuse, recycling, efficiency and substitution, which limit how much ore is taken in the first place.
A student wrote · Energy ResourcesA student wrote: 'Nuclear power is a renewable energy resource because it does not produce carbon dioxide.'
Why it loses marksWhether a resource is renewable depends on whether it is replaced, not on how clean it is. Uranium is mined from a fixed ore body that took millions of years to form, so it is finite and running out of it is only a matter of time. Emissions and renewability are two separate questions.
The answer that scoresNuclear power is non-renewable (finite) because it uses uranium, which is mined from a limited ore body and cannot be replaced. Its advantage is that splitting uranium releases no carbon dioxide at the power station, but it leaves radioactive waste that must be stored safely for thousands of years, and the fuel is still finite, so nuclear power cannot replace fossil fuels permanently.
Revise this topicEnergy Resources
A student wrote · Energy ResourcesA student wrote: 'Wind and solar power are reliable sources of electricity, so a country can close all of its gas-fired power stations once it has built enough wind turbines and solar panels.'
Why it loses marksThe output of a wind farm and a solar farm depends on the weather, not on demand. In a flat calm or at night there may be almost no output, and demand is highest on a still winter evening, exactly when the wind is often weakest and the Sun has set. Something must fill that gap.
The answer that scoresWind and solar are intermittent: output varies with wind speed and with daylight, so they cannot be relied on to meet demand on their own. A country needs backup generating capacity such as gas turbines, or storage such as batteries or pumped hydro, to cover the gaps, and it also needs enough capacity installed to cover the times when the wind and the Sun produce less than their average.
Revise this topicEnergy Resources
A student wrote · Energy ResourcesA student wrote: 'Solar panels generate electricity by heating water to make steam, which spins a turbine.'
Why it loses marksThat describes a solar thermal or concentrating solar power station, not a photovoltaic panel. A photovoltaic cell uses the light itself, converting light energy directly into electrical energy with no boiler, no turbine and no moving parts, which is why roof panels need almost no maintenance.
The answer that scoresPhotovoltaic (PV) cells convert light energy directly into electrical energy, with no steam and no turbine, so they work even on a roof. Concentrating solar power (CSP), as at Noor Ouarzazate in Morocco, uses mirrors to focus sunlight onto a fluid, and the hot fluid raises steam that drives a turbine - the same steam cycle as a fossil-fuel station, but with the Sun as the heat source.
Revise this topicEnergy Resources
A student wrote · Energy ResourcesA student wrote: 'Demand for energy rises because people use more of it; the only factor is how many people there are.'
Why it loses marksPopulation is only one factor. A small wealthy population can use more energy in total than a much larger poor one, because use per person depends on wealth, climate and industry. Demand also depends on what energy is available and what it costs, since a disruption or a shortage raises the price and prices cut demand.
The answer that scoresDemand for energy is affected by transport, personal and national wealth, climate, human population size and industry, and also by disruption to supply, unreliable supply and scarcity of resources. Wealth raises the amount each person can afford to use, climate decides how much heating or air conditioning is needed, industry adds very heavy loads, and a sudden loss of supply raises prices so that users consume less.
Revise this topicEnergy Resources
A student wrote · Conservation and Management of Energy ResourcesA student wrote: 'Energy efficiency and energy conservation are the same thing, because both mean using less energy.'
Why it loses marksThe two overlap but are not the same, and a question that asks for ways to reduce consumption may award separate marks for each. Conservation is about using less, which is a behaviour; efficiency is about getting the same output from less input, which is a property of the device or building. A household can have efficient appliances and still consume a great deal of energy.
The answer that scoresEnergy conservation means using less energy by changing behaviour, such as lowering a thermostat, switching off standby loads or taking the bus. Energy efficiency means getting the same useful output from a smaller energy input, such as an LED lamp or a condensing boiler. Both reduce demand, but conservation depends on people and efficiency depends on equipment, and greater efficiency can be partly cancelled by the rebound effect when the money saved is spent on using more of the same service.
A student wrote · Conservation and Management of Energy ResourcesA student wrote: 'Green hydrogen is made from natural gas and blue hydrogen is made from water, so green hydrogen is the cleaner of the two.'
Why it loses marksThe colours have been swapped. The colour names the production route, not the cleanliness of the final gas, and the two routes are completely different in their feedstock and their emissions.
The answer that scoresBlue hydrogen is produced from natural gas by steam methane reforming, with the carbon dioxide by-product captured and stored, so it still begins with a fossil fuel and depends on the capture working and on methane not leaking. Green hydrogen is produced by the electrolysis of water using electricity from renewable resources, so it releases no carbon dioxide if the electricity is genuinely renewable. Blue is cheaper and uses existing gas infrastructure today; green is the near-zero-carbon route but is more expensive and loses a large share of the energy used to make it.
A student wrote · Conservation and Management of Energy ResourcesA student wrote: 'A heat pump with a coefficient of performance of 4 creates four times as much energy as the electricity it uses, so it does not obey the conservation of energy.'
Why it loses marksA heat pump does not create energy. It moves heat that already exists in the ground or in the outdoor air into the building, and only the small amount of energy needed to run the compressor comes from electricity. The rest arrives from the environment, so nothing is being created and no physical law is broken.
The answer that scoresA heat pump works like a refrigerator in reverse: a refrigerant cycle driven by a compressor absorbs heat from the ground or the outside air and releases it inside the building. A coefficient of performance of 4 means that 1 unit of electrical energy moves 4 units of heat into the building, so it is far less carbon intensive than a gas boiler or an electric heater. The limits are that performance falls if the building is poorly insulated or the radiators are too small to run at a low temperature, and that the emissions saved depend on how the electricity is generated.
A student wrote · Conservation and Management of Energy ResourcesA student wrote: 'Battery storage will solve the problem of intermittent wind and solar power, because the surplus generated in summer can be stored and used in winter.'
Why it loses marksGrid-scale batteries discharge for a few hours, not for months. They are excellent at moving energy from a sunny afternoon to an evening peak, but their capacity, cost and degradation make seasonal storage impossible on a national scale, and there are round-trip losses every time energy passes through them.
The answer that scoresBatteries store energy for hours. They charge when wind and solar output is high and prices are low, discharge into the peak, and steady the grid frequency in milliseconds, which is why they are so useful with a high renewable share. They cannot carry energy from summer to winter, because the capacity required would be impossibly large and expensive and the batteries would self-discharge and degrade. Seasonal storage needs other methods such as pumped hydro-electric storage, hydrogen or large thermal stores, used together with a mix of generating sources so that the wind is always blowing or the sun shining somewhere.
A student wrote · FrackingA student wrote: 'Fracking is the process of drilling a deep well to reach oil and gas trapped in permeable sandstone.'
Why it loses marksFracking is defined by the rock and by the technique. The rock is shale, which is impermeable, and the technique is hydraulic fracturing: pumping fluid in at high pressure to crack the rock. Drilling into a conventional reservoir of permeable sandstone is ordinary oil and gas extraction, not fracking.
The answer that scoresFracking is the extraction of natural gas or petroleum from shale rock by hydraulic fracturing. Water, proppant and a small amount of chemicals are pumped into the impermeable shale at very high pressure, which cracks the rock and creates pathways so that the gas can flow to the well, and the proppant left in the fractures holds them open once the pressure is released.
Revise this topicFracking
A student wrote · FrackingA student wrote: 'Banning fracking removes its environmental impact.'
Why it loses marksA ban removes the local impact, not the demand. The gas is imported from somewhere else, so the water use, the methane leakage and the induced earthquakes happen in the producing country, and the banning country may end up burning more coal.
The answer that scoresA ban removes the risk at the site completely, which is a real benefit for local water supplies and for people living nearby. But the demand for gas continues, so the country imports it, and the environmental costs of producing it move abroad. If the gas is not available, electricity may be generated from coal, which produces about twice the carbon dioxide of gas for the same output. This is why many governments regulate fracking with impact assessments, cementing standards, water recycling and seismic monitoring instead of banning it outright.
Revise this topicFracking
A student wrote · FrackingA student wrote: 'Fracking causes damaging earthquakes because the fluid pressure breaks the rock apart.'
Why it loses marksFracturing does break the rock, but the fractures are metres long and the earthquakes produced are almost always far too small to be felt. The damaging earthquakes linked to shale gas come from a different process: the deep disposal of wastewater, which raises pore pressure on a fault and lets it slip.
The answer that scoresFracturing itself produces micro-earthquakes that nobody notices. The felt and damaging earthquakes are caused when flowback and produced water are pumped into a deep disposal well, because the injected water raises the pressure in the pore spaces of the rock and reduces the friction holding a fault closed. The fault then slips. This is managed by monitoring the site with seismometers and applying a traffic light system that pauses or stops work, and by recycling water so that less has to be disposed of - and in Oklahoma, by limiting the volumes that may be injected.
Revise this topicFracking
A student wrote · FrackingA student wrote: 'Methane leakage does not matter much, because gas is mostly methane and only a little of it escapes.'
Why it loses marksWhat matters is the leakage rate, not the size of the leak compared with the gas that is sold. Methane is a far more powerful greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide over the short term, so even a leakage rate of a few per cent can cancel out the benefit of gas producing less carbon dioxide than coal.
The answer that scoresMethane is a much more powerful greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide, particularly over the short term, so a small percentage leak can remove the climate advantage that gas has over coal and make the climate case for fracking collapse. Leakage is reduced by capturing gas through a green completion instead of flaring it, by using low-bleed valves and seals, and by running leak detection and repair programmes on wells, compressors and pipelines. The limitation is cost: small leaks are difficult to find and expensive to fix, so operators have to be required to do it.
Revise this topicFracking

Land

A student wrote · Soils and Crop GrowthA student wrote: 'Clay is the best soil for crop growth because it holds the most water and the most nutrients.'
Why it loses marksIt is true that a clay soil holds water and nutrient ions strongly, but that is only half of the story. The same tiny pore spaces that hold the water drain slowly, so the soil is poorly aerated, cold in spring and very difficult to cultivate, and in a wet season the pores fill with water and the roots are starved of the oxygen they need for respiration. Holding the most water is not a benefit if the water cannot drain away.
The answer that scoresA clay soil holds water and nutrients well but drains badly and is poorly aerated and hard to cultivate, so it is not the best medium for most crops. A loam is better because it combines the good points of sand, silt and clay: enough clay and silt to hold water and nutrient ions, and enough sand and large pore spaces to drain excess water and let air back in to the roots, while still being easy to cultivate.
Revise this topicSoils and Crop Growth
A student wrote · Soils and Crop GrowthA student wrote: 'Adding more fertiliser always increases the crop yield, so the more a farmer applies the better.'
Why it loses marksNutrients are only one of several factors. Growth is limited by whichever factor is in shortest supply, so if the crop is short of water, of light or of warmth, extra nitrate will not raise the yield. Once nitrogen is no longer the limiting factor, further applications feed the weeds, are leached out of the soil into rivers and groundwater where they cause eutrophication, or are simply wasted money.
The answer that scoresFertiliser raises yield only where the nutrient was the limiting factor. A balanced approach supplies the ions the crop needs, in the amounts a soil test shows are missing, while correcting the other limiting factors - soil water, drainage, pH, structure - so that the crop can actually use them. Applying more than the crop can take up wastes money and pollutes water.
Revise this topicSoils and Crop Growth
A student wrote · Soils and Crop GrowthA student wrote: 'Weather and climate mean the same thing: the conditions of the atmosphere in a place.'
Why it loses marksThe syllabus defines weather as the day-to-day conditions of the atmosphere in a location, and that definition is examiner-friendly precisely because it is narrow. Weather changes from hour to hour and day to day, so a wet week does not tell you anything reliable about the long-term pattern. Climate is the average pattern of weather over many years, and the two terms are tested separately.
The answer that scoresWeather is the day-to-day conditions of the atmosphere in a location - temperature, rainfall, wind, cloud and sunshine - which change from hour to hour and day to day. Climate is the average pattern of those conditions at a place over many years. A single storm is weather; the fact that a region has a wet season and a dry season every year is climate.
Revise this topicSoils and Crop Growth
A student wrote · Soils and Crop GrowthA student wrote: 'A soil with a pH of 4.5 is alkaline, so the farmer should add lime to lower the pH.'
Why it loses marksTwo errors in one sentence. A pH below 7 is acidic, not alkaline, so 4.5 is a strongly acidic soil. And lime, which is calcium carbonate, is alkaline: it raises the pH rather than lowering it. Adding lime to a soil to make it more acidic would ruin it, because in a strongly alkaline soil iron, manganese and phosphate become unavailable to the crop.
The answer that scoresA pH of 4.5 is acidic, so the soil is too acid for most crops and phosphate may be locked up while aluminium can become toxic to the roots. The farmer should apply lime, which is calcium carbonate, to raise the pH towards 6 to 7, choosing the amount from a soil test because too much lime makes other nutrients unavailable. Raising the pH also has to be repeated, because the soil re-acidifies with continued cropping.
Revise this topicSoils and Crop Growth
A student wrote · Food production and crop yieldA student wrote: 'Intensive farming means farming a very large area of land, so only big companies can do it.'
Why it loses marksThe student has mixed up intensive with extensive. Intensity is measured in inputs per hectare, not in hectares. A large area farmed with few inputs per hectare is extensive, and it gives a low yield per hectare.
The answer that scoresIntensive farming uses very high inputs of labour, capital, water, fertiliser or machinery on each hectare to get a high yield from that hectare, and it can be done on a small plot, for example a glasshouse of tomatoes or a two-hectare market garden. Extensive farming is the opposite: a very large area with few inputs per hectare and a low yield per hectare, such as cattle ranching on dry grassland. The two words describe inputs and yields per hectare, not the size of the farm or the size of the business.
A student wrote · Food production and crop yieldA student wrote: 'Manure is better than NPK fertiliser because it contains more nitrogen, so a farm that uses manure never needs to buy fertiliser.'
Why it loses marksManure contains the same nutrients but in lower and much more variable concentrations, and it releases them slowly as soil organisms break it down. It cannot supply the large, immediate amount of nitrogen that a high-yielding cereal crop needs, and its nutrient content is not known from load to load.
The answer that scoresThe two have different strengths. Inorganic NPK fertiliser supplies nitrogen as nitrate, phosphorus as phosphate and potassium as potassium ions in a known concentration and ratio, so a deficiency can be corrected quickly, but it adds no organic matter and its surplus nitrate is easily leached. Organic fertiliser such as manure, crop residue and mulch adds those nutrients more slowly and in smaller amounts, but it also adds the organic matter that gives the soil its structure, its water-holding capacity and its soil organisms. The best practice is to use both: return organic matter to keep the soil in condition and top up with inorganic nutrients when a soil test shows a shortage.
A student wrote · Food production and crop yieldA student wrote: 'Flood irrigation cannot harm the soil, because any water the crop does not use simply drains away.'
Why it loses marksWater that cannot drain away is the problem. Where the soil is heavy or the field is level, the pore spaces fill with water and remain filled, so the roots have no oxygen for respiration. In a dry climate the water that evaporates leaves its dissolved salts behind, and those salts build up in the topsoil.
The answer that scoresOver-irrigating causes three separate problems. Water logging, because the pore spaces are full of water and the roots cannot get the oxygen they need; salinisation, because evaporation leaves the dissolved salts behind and they accumulate in the topsoil until the crop will not grow; and soil erosion, where the surplus water runs off bare or sloping ground and carries the nutrient-rich topsoil with it. Trickle irrigation avoids all three by putting a small amount of water at the base of each plant, and drainage or a fallow period may be needed to recover a field that is already affected.
A student wrote · Food production and crop yieldA student wrote: 'If an insecticide stops killing the pest, the farmer should spray a stronger dose of the same chemical.'
Why it loses marksThis makes resistance worse. The individuals that survived the first sprays are the ones that carry the genes for resistance, and a stronger dose kills more of their competitors and of their natural enemies, leaving the survivors to breed with less competition. The farmer pays more each season for a chemical that works less well.
The answer that scoresResistance develops because the insects that survive a spray pass on the genes that let them survive it, so the population becomes more resistant each generation. A stronger dose speeds this up and also causes pest resurgence, because the broad-spectrum spray kills the predators and parasites that were keeping the pest in check. The farmer should instead rotate between chemicals with different active ingredients, use biological control alongside them, rotate and intercrop so the pest cannot build up, monitor the crop and spray only when the pest passes the level at which the damage costs more than the treatment.
A student wrote · Soil erosionA student wrote: 'Soil erosion only happens in deserts, because deserts are hot and dry and have no vegetation.'
Why it loses marksThis confuses soil erosion with desertification. Erosion is happening on farmland all over the world, in wet temperate countries as well as dry ones, and water is the main agent in most of them. A bare field on a steep slope in a wet climate can lose more soil in one storm than dry land loses in a year of wind.
The answer that scoresSoil erosion happens wherever bare soil is exposed to moving water or wind. In humid regions the main agent is water: raindrops detach the particles, run-off carries them down the slope and cuts rills and then gullies. In semi-arid regions during drought, wind is the main agent and takes the fine silt, clay and organic matter. Desertification is the longer-term result of erosion and vegetation loss in dry regions, not the only place where erosion occurs.
Revise this topicSoil erosion
A student wrote · Soil erosionA student wrote: 'Contour ploughing means ploughing up and down the slope, so that the water drains away quickly down the furrows.'
Why it loses marksThis is exactly the wrong way round. Ploughing up and down the slope is one of the poor practices that causes erosion: every furrow becomes a channel that carries water and soil straight downhill.
The answer that scoresContour ploughing means ploughing across the slope, along the contour lines. Each furrow then runs along the hillside like a small dam, so it slows the run-off and gives the water time to soak in, and soil washed out of one furrow is trapped in the next one down. The water that does reach the bottom has to be led away in a safe outlet, such as a grassed waterway, or it will break through the furrows and cut a gully.
Revise this topicSoil erosion
A student wrote · Soil erosionA student wrote: 'Once the hillside has been terraced, the erosion problem is solved for good.'
Why it loses marksTerracing reduces erosion sharply, but it does not remove it, and it does not maintain itself. The mark scheme wants the reduction and its limits, and a claim that the problem is permanently solved cannot be supported.
The answer that scoresTerracing cuts the slope into flat steps, so rain soaks in where the crop is growing and the risers hold the soil and slow the run-off, which reduces erosion a great deal. The limit is maintenance: the risers, drains and outlets must be repaired after storms, an exceptional storm can overtop the steps, and abandoned terraces collapse and release a large volume of soil at once. Building them is also very labour-intensive, so on a gentle slope contour ploughing, bunds and a cover crop may give most of the benefit for far less work.
Revise this topicSoil erosion
A student wrote · Soil erosionA student wrote: 'The nutrients lost with the topsoil can be replaced with fertiliser, so soil erosion does not really matter.'
Why it loses marksFertiliser replaces some nutrients, but it does not replace the soil. The mark is for understanding that the depth, structure and organic matter of the topsoil are what the crop grows in, and that a farmer cannot buy back the soil that has gone.
The answer that scoresApplying NPK fertiliser can replace the nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium that were carried away, but the field is still shallower, so it holds less water and dries out faster, and its structure is poorer, so the next storm detaches more soil. The organic matter that held the crumbs together, stored the nutrients and fed the soil organisms is lost with the topsoil and takes years to rebuild. On steep, thin soils the lost ground cannot be replaced at all, so preventing the erosion is far cheaper than treating the symptoms.
Revise this topicSoil erosion

Water

A student wrote · Water Sources and SupplyA student wrote: 'Groundwater is water in underground rivers and lakes that flow beneath the ground, and an aquifer is a lake of fresh water under the desert.'
Why it loses marksGroundwater is not a river or a lake. It is water filling the tiny pores, cracks and joints of a permeable rock, moving extremely slowly. An aquifer is not a void filled with water either: it is the body of rock that stores and transmits the water, and the water table is the top of the saturated zone rather than the surface of an underground lake.
The answer that scoresAn aquifer is a permeable rock, such as sandstone, chalk or gravel, that holds water in its pores and allows it to flow. The water table is the upper surface of the saturated zone; it rises in the wet season and falls in the dry season and when the aquifer is pumped. Water is abstracted through a well or borehole, and the level falls if pumping is faster than the recharge seeping down from the surface.
Revise this topicWater Sources and Supply
A student wrote · Water Sources and SupplyA student wrote: 'Chlorine is added to water to make it clear, and once the water has been filtered it is potable.'
Why it loses marksFiltration removes fine particles and many microorganisms, but not all of them, so filtered water is not automatically safe to drink. Chlorination is added to kill the bacteria and viruses that remain, not to clear the water; clearing the water is the job of sedimentation and filtration.
The answer that scoresPotable water is water that is safe to drink. Screening, sedimentation and filtration remove solids, but only chlorination disinfects the water, killing bacteria and viruses and leaving a residual that protects it in the pipes. Water can be perfectly clear and still carry pathogens, so clarity is not proof of safety.
Revise this topicWater Sources and Supply
A student wrote · Water Sources and SupplyA student wrote: 'Desalination is the cheapest way to supply a dry country with water, because the sea is free and there is always plenty of it.'
Why it loses marksThe seawater is free but the process is not. Distillation needs a great deal of heat to boil the water, reverse osmosis needs high pressure and electricity, the plant and the membranes are expensive to build and to replace, and the concentrated brine must be disposed of.
The answer that scoresDesalination is valuable because it gives a supply that does not depend on rainfall, but it is one of the most expensive sources of fresh water per cubic metre. It should be compared with the alternatives: repairing leaks, metering and charging by volume, reusing treated water for irrigation and flushing, and drip irrigation are all usually cheaper per cubic metre. Desalination is justified where those savings have already been made and there is still a shortfall, and where cheap energy is available.
Revise this topicWater Sources and Supply
A student wrote · Water Sources and SupplyA student wrote: 'A multipurpose dam has no real disadvantages, because the electricity it makes is renewable and it protects the town from flooding.'
Why it loses marksRenewable electricity and flood control are genuine benefits, but the mark scheme wants the costs as well, and the people who carry the costs are usually not the people who receive the benefits.
The answer that scoresA dam floods land upstream, so villages, farmland, forest and sometimes archaeological sites are lost and the residents have to be resettled. It traps sediment, so the river downstream erodes its bed and banks and floodplain soils lose their fertility; it blocks migratory fish such as salmon; water is lost by evaporation from the reservoir; and on an international river the flow and fisheries of the next country are changed. The benefits - flood control, hydro-electric power, irrigation, storage, transport, recreation, tourism and fish farming - must be weighed against these costs, with a judgement about who gains and who loses.
Revise this topicWater Sources and Supply
A student wrote · Water PollutionA student wrote: 'Eutrophication happens because the fertiliser that runs into the river is poisonous to fish, so they die.'
Why it loses marksNitrate and phosphate are not directly poisonous to fish at the concentrations found in a polluted river. The nutrients feed an algal bloom, and it is the bacteria decomposing the dead algae that remove the oxygen from the water. Blaming the fertiliser itself misses the whole mechanism and loses the sequence marks.
The answer that scoresThe nitrate and phosphate enrich the water, so algae grow explosively and form a bloom on the surface. The bloom blocks the light, so the submerged plants die, and the algae die as the nutrients are used up and sink. Bacteria decompose the dead material and use oxygen, so the biochemical oxygen demand rises and the dissolved oxygen falls. The fish suffocate from lack of oxygen, and the final anaerobic decomposition gives the water its black colour and foul smell.
Revise this topicWater Pollution
A student wrote · Water PollutionA student wrote: 'Bioaccumulation and biomagnification are the same thing: the toxin builds up as you go along the food chain.'
Why it loses marksThe two words describe processes at different scales. Bioaccumulation is about one organism over its lifetime; biomagnification is about the change in concentration between one trophic level and the next. Using one word for both loses the definition mark as well as the example mark.
The answer that scoresBioaccumulation is the build-up of a toxic substance in a single organism over time, because it takes the substance in from the water, the sediment or its food faster than it can excrete it, so older individuals carry more. Biomagnification is the increase in concentration of that substance as it is passed up a food chain, because each predator eats many prey and so collects the toxin from all of them. Mercury released into Minamata Bay in Japan was bioaccumulated by the fish and biomagnified up to the people who ate them, who suffered severe damage to the nervous system.
Revise this topicWater Pollution
A student wrote · Water PollutionA student wrote: 'Chlorinating the effluent at the sewage works removes the nitrate and phosphate, so the river downstream will not become eutrophic.'
Why it loses marksChlorination kills the pathogens, so it prevents cholera, but it does nothing to the nutrients. Confusing disinfection with nutrient removal means the answer describes the wrong stage of treatment and predicts the wrong outcome.
The answer that scoresChlorination (or ultraviolet light or ozone) is a disinfection step that kills bacteria and viruses. Nitrate and phosphate have to be removed by tertiary treatment, by stripping phosphate out with iron or aluminium salts, removing nitrate by denitrification or in a constructed wetland, before the effluent is discharged. Without that stage the effluent still enriches the river, and it will still bloom and lose its oxygen.
Revise this topicWater Pollution
A student wrote · Water PollutionA student wrote: 'Acid rain kills fish by burning them, and all lakes are affected equally whichever rock they are on.'
Why it loses marksAcid rain is not a burn, and lakes are very far from equally affected. The damage is caused by the low pH plus the aluminium released from the soil, and the geology of the catchment decides how far the pH falls at all. Ignoring the rock type loses the explanation marks in this question.
The answer that scoresThe acid water damages the gills and the eggs of the fish and kills the invertebrates they feed on, and as the water becomes more acid it releases aluminium from the soil, which coats the gills and suffocates the fish. Lakes on granite and other hard, insoluble rocks cannot neutralise the acid, so their pH falls furthest, which is why the lakes of southern Norway and south-west Sweden lost their fish. Lakes on limestone or chalk are buffered by calcium carbonate, which neutralises the acid, and their fish survive. Liming a lake replaces some of that missing neutralising capacity, but it must be repeated and it does not stop the acid falling.
Revise this topicWater Pollution
A student wrote · Water-related DiseasesA student wrote: 'Malaria is caught by drinking dirty water, so the way to prevent it is to boil drinking water and keep the wells clean.'
Why it loses marksMalaria is not water-borne. It is a water-related insect-vector disease, and the Plasmodium parasite is transmitted only by the bite of an infected female Anopheles mosquito. The parasite is not in the drinking water at all, so boiling the water has no effect on malaria. This answer confuses the class of the disease and therefore the whole control strategy.
The answer that scoresMalaria is spread by mosquitoes, not by water. The vector is the female Anopheles mosquito and the pathogen is the Plasmodium parasite, which passes from an infected person to the mosquito in a blood meal and from the mosquito to the next person in its bite. Control is by personal protection - insecticide-treated nets, repellent, antimalarial drugs and vaccination - and by vector control: draining and covering breeding areas, spraying with insecticide, sterilising male mosquitoes and biological control such as larvivorous fish. Cleaning the drinking water supply controls cholera, typhoid and diarrhoeal disease, not malaria.
Revise this topicWater-related Diseases
A student wrote · Water-related DiseasesA student wrote: 'Sleeping under an insecticide-treated net protects you from malaria and from dengue, because both are spread by mosquitoes.'
Why it loses marksThe net only protects against the mosquito that bites while the sleeper is under it. Anopheles, which carries malaria, bites mainly between dusk and dawn, so a bed net is highly effective. Aedes aegypti, which carries dengue, bites during the day when the net is not in use, so a bed net gives very little protection.
The answer that scoresNets work against Anopheles because it bites at night, and that is also why they protect a whole household and not just the sleeper. Dengue must be controlled differently, because Aedes aegypti bites during the day: water containers, tyres, gutters and other small containers of clean water are emptied, scrubbed and covered so that the larvae have nowhere to develop, drains are cleared, repellent and window screens are used in the daytime, and insecticide is applied or the mosquito population is reduced by releasing sterile or Wolbachia-carrying males.
Revise this topicWater-related Diseases
A student wrote · Water-related DiseasesA student wrote: 'A cholera outbreak in a city can be stopped by a vaccination campaign, because everyone who is vaccinated is protected for life.'
Why it loses marksThe oral cholera vaccine gives useful but incomplete protection, and it does not last for life, so a vaccinated person can still be infected through the same unsafe water. Vaccination reduces illness and deaths while the water and sanitation are repaired; it does not remove the pathogen from the environment.
The answer that scoresVaccination is valuable during an outbreak because it protects people quickly while the cause is being dealt with, but the definitive measures are the ones that separate sewage from drinking water: handwashing with soap, adequate sanitation and sewage treatment, and a potable supply by chlorination or boiling, with water protected between the source and the home. In a city with no sewers and a contaminated supply, vaccination without those measures simply leaves the source in place and cases will continue.
Revise this topicWater-related Diseases
A student wrote · Water-related DiseasesA student wrote: 'Schistosomiasis is caught by drinking water from a lake, so chlorinating the water supply prevents it.'
Why it loses marksSchistosomiasis is a water-based disease, not a water-borne one. The larvae released by freshwater snails swim in the water and burrow through the skin of anyone wading, washing, fishing or swimming, so the infection is picked up by contact with the water, not by drinking it. Neither boiling nor chlorinating drinking water stops it, and the treatment is the drug praziquantel, not a disinfectant.
The answer that scoresControl works on the parasite's life cycle. Patients are treated with praziquantel to clear the worms; the snail intermediate host is killed with molluscicides or removed by clearing the aquatic plants that shelter it; piped water, washing areas and latrines are provided so that people do not have to enter the water to wash or defecate into it; and health education warns children and workers away from shallow water where the larvae are. Treating people alone leads to quick reinfection while the snails and the contaminated water remain.
Revise this topicWater-related Diseases
A student wrote · Marine AquacultureA student wrote: 'Marine aquaculture means catching marine species in the sea and selling them, so it is a kind of fishing.'
Why it loses marksThis confuses farming with catching. The definition turns on captivity and control: the farmer owns the stock, produces or buys the seed, feeds and protects it, and decides when to harvest. Catching wild species is a fishery, not aquaculture.
The answer that scoresMarine aquaculture is the farming of marine species in captivity, limited to fish, crustaceans and seaweeds. The stock is controlled by people from the hatchery to the harvest, so it is the opposite of a wild fishery, in which nobody controls how many animals exist or where they go.
Revise this topicMarine Aquaculture
A student wrote · Marine AquacultureA student wrote: 'Farmed fish cannot affect wild fish, because the nets keep the farmed fish inside.'
Why it loses marksThe net is not a barrier to anything except the adult fish. Water, parasites, disease and dissolved waste pass through it in both directions, and the net itself fails in storms, through wear and when seals tear it.
The answer that scoresFarmed and wild fish are linked through the net. Sea lice that multiply on the crowded farmed stock are carried by the tide onto wild salmon smolts leaving the rivers; infections can spread from the pens to passing wild fish; nutrients from uneaten feed and faeces leave the pens and enrich the water; and when a net tears, farmed fish escape, interbreed with wild relatives and compete with them for food and spawning sites. Only a closed or recirculating system removes the connection.
Revise this topicMarine Aquaculture
A student wrote · Marine AquacultureA student wrote: 'Increasing the mesh size of nets is bad for the fishery, because more fish escape through the net and the catch is smaller.'
Why it loses marksThe fish that escape through a larger mesh are the small ones - juveniles that have not yet bred. Losing them from a single catch is exactly the point: they will grow and spawn, so the catch in later seasons is larger than it would have been.
The answer that scoresA larger mesh lets juveniles escape before they are landed, so they survive to breed and the spawning stock is maintained. It does reduce the catch of small fish in the short term, and some fish are still killed in the net, but the long-term yield of the fishery is higher than if the juveniles were removed.
Revise this topicMarine Aquaculture
A student wrote · Marine AquacultureA student wrote: 'Nutrients released from fish cages are good for the sea, because they feed the algae and the algae feed the fish.'
Why it loses marksA small addition of nutrients is used by the food web, but a farm releases nutrients continuously at a point, and the ecosystem is not adapted to that load. The same process that fertilises the water also removes the oxygen from it.
The answer that scoresUneaten feed, faeces and ammonia leave the pens as nitrogen, phosphorus and organic carbon. The dissolved nutrients encourage phytoplankton and algal growth in a plume down-current, while the organic waste settles under the cages, where bacteria break it down and use up the oxygen in the sediment. The seabed under the farm becomes black and oxygen-poor and the bottom community dies, which is nutrient enrichment turning into pollution, not food.
Revise this topicMarine Aquaculture
A student wrote · Oil PollutionA student wrote: 'Booms remove the oil from the sea, so once you have put a boom around the spill the problem is solved.'
Why it loses marksA boom is a floating barrier that only contains the oil while it is still afloat. It does not take the oil out of the water, so the oil is still there and still has to be recovered, and a boom fails altogether in rough weather or in a current above about one knot.
The answer that scoresBooms are used to encircle a slick around a leaking ship, to deflect a slick away from a sensitive coast, or to seal off the mouth of a creek or lagoon. They contain the oil, and skimmers or sorbents then remove it from inside the boom. Booms only work in calm water, because a current carries the oil under the boom and waves wash it over the top, and they need anchors, boats and trained crews to deploy and tend them.
Revise this topicOil Pollution
A student wrote · Oil PollutionA student wrote: 'Dispersant sprays are the best answer to any spill, because they make the oil disappear and leave the sea clean.'
Why it loses marksDispersants do not remove the oil; they break it into small droplets that mix into the water column, so the oil is moved rather than taken out of the environment. The droplets are more available to fish, plankton, filter-feeding shellfish and coral, and the surface looks clean while the pollution is still there.
The answer that scoresA dispersant is useful when a large slick in deep, open water would otherwise reach the coast before it could be recovered, because it stops the slick forming and speeds up dilution and bacterial breakdown. It must not be used in shallow water or near coral reefs, shellfish beds, mangroves or seagrass, where the dispersed oil does more damage than floating oil would. Skimmers and sorbents remove oil, dispersants only relocate it.
Revise this topicOil Pollution
A student wrote · Oil PollutionA student wrote: 'Oil is lighter than water, so every drop of a spill floats and can be skimmed off the surface.'
Why it loses marksOnly part of the oil stays on the surface. The light fractions evaporate, wave action turns much of the rest into sticky emulsion, and the heaviest fractions, together with oil stuck to sediment particles, sink to the seabed and into the mud of estuaries. Oil that reaches a beach is buried in the sand and released again later. None of this oil can be reached from the surface.
The answer that scoresSome of the oil always escapes recovery: a slick that has spread thinner than about a millimetre is too thin for skimmers and too thin to burn, emulsified oil cannot be pumped or dispersed easily, and oil in the sediment or buried in a beach is released again by storms for years. On a reef or in a mangrove swamp the remaining oil cannot be removed at all, which is why preventing the spill and containing it at sea matter so much.
Revise this topicOil Pollution
A student wrote · Oil PollutionA student wrote: 'Nearly all the oil in the sea comes from the big tanker accidents that make the news.'
Why it loses marksTanker accidents are the most dramatic cause and can be catastrophic for one stretch of coast, but the larger share of the oil entering the sea each year comes from routine operations: cleaning of tanks at sea, oily bilge water, ballast from cargo tanks, spills during loading at terminals, leaking pipelines, refineries and oil washed off roads, factories and cities by rivers and drains.
The answer that scoresA big tanker accident releases a huge volume in one place in a few days, and it deserves the attention it gets. But chronic pollution from pipelines, ageing wells and routine discharges releases a steady supply of oil, close to coasts and over decades, rather than once. The Niger Delta, where thousands of small leaks have polluted creeks, mangroves and farmland for years, shows how much damage the slow, chronic source can do.
Revise this topicOil Pollution
A student wrote · Plastic PollutionA student wrote: 'A bioplastic is biodegradable, so anything labelled bio will break down quickly wherever it is left.'
Why it loses marksA bioplastic is defined by being made fully or partly from biological raw materials, not by what happens to it after use. Bio-PET made from sugar cane is chemically the same as ordinary fossil-fuel PET and is not biodegradable, so it fragments in the sea exactly like a standard bottle. Even a genuinely biodegradable plastic needs the right decomposers and warm, moist, oxygen-rich conditions, which cold seawater and landfill do not provide.
The answer that scoresA bioplastic is a plastic made from biological raw materials instead of fossil fuels, and it can be biodegradable or non-biodegradable. A biodegradable plastic is one designed to decompose in water or soil, broken down by bacteria and fungi into water, biomass and gases, and its rate of decomposition depends on biotic factors such as the decomposers present and abiotic factors such as temperature, moisture and oxygen. Only a plastic that is both bio-based and designed to be biodegradable, and then placed where decomposition can happen, will break down quickly.
Revise this topicPlastic Pollution
A student wrote · Plastic PollutionA student wrote: 'Recycling solves plastic pollution because all plastic can be recycled, so the answer is to collect more and recycle it all.'
Why it loses marksPlastics are not all recyclable. Mixed, dirty and multi-layer packaging has almost no value, collection has to be clean and separated, a polymer can only be recycled a few times before the chains shorten, food-safety rules limit recycled plastic in food packaging, and recycled material competes with cheap virgin plastic made from oil. Only a small fraction of all the plastic ever produced has been recycled, so recycling cannot keep pace with production.
The answer that scoresRecycling is worth doing for clean single-polymer streams such as PET bottles and HDPE containers, because it saves energy and oil and keeps material in use. But it has real limits: mixed and contaminated plastic cannot be recycled economically, separate collection is essential, quality falls with each cycle, and demand for recycled material is uncertain. So recycling is one part of a package that has to be led by reduction and reuse, better collection and safe disposal, and legislation that makes producers responsible for their packaging.
Revise this topicPlastic Pollution
A student wrote · Plastic PollutionA student wrote: 'Microplastics are very small pieces of plastic, less than 5 cm across, formed when bigger items break up.'
Why it loses marksThe size given in the definition is 5 mm, not 5 cm, so the student is out by a factor of ten. The student has also left out the other half of the definition: microplastics are not only formed when larger plastics break down, they are also manufactured at that size and used in commercial products, such as microbeads in cosmetics and the plastic pellets used as industrial raw material.
The answer that scoresMicroplastics are plastics less than 5 mm in length. Primary microplastics are manufactured at that size and used in commercial products, including microbeads in facial scrubs and toothpaste and the nurdles that are melted down to make plastic products. Secondary microplastics are formed when larger plastics break down, for example fibres shed from synthetic clothing in a washing machine and particles worn off car tyres, which are washed into drains and rivers and reach the sea.
Revise this topicPlastic Pollution
A student wrote · Plastic PollutionA student wrote: 'Cleaning up the ocean gyres will solve plastic pollution, so there is no need to reduce how much plastic is produced.'
Why it loses marksThe accumulated plastic in the gyres is mostly fragments and fibres spread thinly over an enormous area, so a clean-up can recover only a small fraction of it at a very high cost per tonne, and the equipment can catch fish and other marine life. It also does nothing about the plastic arriving every day from rivers, fishing gear, tyres and textiles, and the collected waste still has to be disposed of. Clean-ups treat the symptom.
The answer that scoresClean-up projects protect wildlife locally, restore beaches and raise awareness, but they remove only a small fraction of the plastic already in the sea and are expensive. The cause is plastic continuing to enter the environment, so the effective response works upstream: avoiding single-use plastics, alternative packaging, safe disposal and better collection, recycling where it genuinely works, extended producer responsibility and legislation such as the Basel Convention plastics amendment. A judgement worth making is that clean-ups and source reduction are complementary, but only reduction changes the trend.
Revise this topicPlastic Pollution

The Atmosphere and Human Activities

A student wrote · The AtmosphereA student wrote: 'Oxygen is the most abundant gas in the atmosphere, making up about 78%, with nitrogen at about 21%.'
Why it loses marksThe two percentages have been swapped. Nitrogen is the most abundant gas in clean dry air, and oxygen is the second. A question that asks for the composition of clean air will not award the marks for the wrong way round.
The answer that scoresClean dry air is about 78% nitrogen and 21% oxygen by volume. Together these two gases are 99% of the air, which is why argon, at about 0.9%, is only the third most abundant gas, and carbon dioxide is about 0.04%.
Revise this topicThe Atmosphere
A student wrote · The AtmosphereA student wrote: 'The ozone layer is in the troposphere, which is why it protects us from ultraviolet radiation.'
Why it loses marksThe ozone layer is in the lower stratosphere, not the troposphere. The troposphere is the lowest layer, containing the weather and most of the atmosphere's water vapour, and ozone there is a pollutant rather than a shield.
The answer that scoresThe ozone layer is in the lower stratosphere, roughly 15 to 35 km above the surface. It absorbs most of the harmful ultraviolet radiation from the Sun before it reaches the surface, which reduces skin cancer and cataracts and limits damage to crops and to phytoplankton in the oceans. Ozone formed at ground level in the troposphere is a component of photochemical smog and damages lungs and crops.
Revise this topicThe Atmosphere
A student wrote · The AtmosphereA student wrote: 'Temperature falls with height all the way up through the atmosphere, because the air gets further from the Earth.'
Why it loses marksThis is only true in the troposphere and the mesosphere. Temperature rises with height in the stratosphere, because ozone absorbs ultraviolet radiation there, and again in the thermosphere, because the thin gas absorbs the most energetic solar radiation. The direction of the temperature change is exactly what defines each layer.
The answer that scoresTemperature falls with height in the troposphere, rises with height in the stratosphere, falls again in the mesosphere and rises again in the thermosphere - down, up, down, up. The troposphere is heated from below by the surface, the stratosphere is heated from within by ozone absorbing ultraviolet radiation, the mesosphere has almost no source of heat, and the thermosphere absorbs very short-wavelength ultraviolet radiation and X-rays.
Revise this topicThe Atmosphere
A student wrote · The AtmosphereA student wrote: 'A city with heavy smog has different clean air from the standard figures: nitrogen falls to about 60% and carbon dioxide rises to about 5%.'
Why it loses marksThe percentages of clean air describe the mixture of the main gases, which human pollution does not alter appreciably. Pollutants such as particles, nitrogen oxides and ground-level ozone are present in trace amounts, measured in parts per million, and they are added on top of the 78% nitrogen and 21% oxygen rather than replacing them.
The answer that scoresEven in a heavily polluted city the main composition is unchanged: about 78% nitrogen and 21% oxygen. The pollution is a small addition to that mixture, concentrated in the troposphere because that is where it is released and where weather can disperse or wash it out. Carbon dioxide is about 0.04% of clean air and measured in parts per million, because such a small number needs a sensitive unit for change to be visible.
Revise this topicThe Atmosphere
A student wrote · Climate ChangeA student wrote: 'Greenhouse gases trap heat by reflecting the Sun's radiation back into space, so the heat cannot reach the Earth.'
Why it loses marksThe direction is wrong in both halves of the sentence. Greenhouse gases are largely transparent to the short-wave radiation arriving from the Sun, so sunlight reaches the surface. They act on the long-wave infrared radiation that the warmed surface gives off, absorbing it and re-emitting it in all directions, including back towards the surface.
The answer that scoresSolar radiation passes through the atmosphere and is absorbed by the land and oceans and partly reflected back into space. The warmed surface re-emits radiation as infrared, and greenhouse gases absorb this infrared radiation and emit the energy again as thermal (heat) energy, some of it back towards the surface, which keeps the surface warmer than it would otherwise be. Adding more greenhouse gases makes more of this infrared radiation return to the surface, so the Earth warms.
Revise this topicClimate Change
A student wrote · Climate ChangeA student wrote: 'Global warming is caused by the hole in the ozone layer, which lets extra sunlight through and heats the Earth.'
Why it loses marksThese are two different problems with different causes. Ozone depletion is caused by CFCs destroying ozone in the stratosphere, and it allows more ultraviolet radiation to reach the surface, which increases skin cancer, cataracts and damage to crops. Global warming is caused by greenhouse gases absorbing and re-emitting infrared radiation. A thinner ozone layer does not cause the greenhouse effect, even though CFCs happen to be greenhouse gases as well.
The answer that scoresThe enhanced greenhouse effect is caused by the increased concentration of greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide from human activity, which absorb and re-emit infrared radiation from the warmed surface. Ozone depletion is a separate issue: CFCs in aerosols and refrigerants break down ozone in the stratosphere, and the resulting thinning lets more ultraviolet radiation reach the Earth's surface, increasing rates of cancer and cataracts and damaging vegetation. Some CFCs contribute to warming as well, but the ozone hole is not the cause of global warming.
Revise this topicClimate Change
A student wrote · Climate ChangeA student wrote: 'Adapting to climate change means countries reducing their emissions of greenhouse gases by using renewable energy.'
Why it loses marksThat is mitigation, not adaptation. The two words are not interchangeable, and a question that asks about adaptation is looking for changes in behaviour, practices and infrastructure that cope with impacts which are already happening.
The answer that scoresClimate change adaptation is altering behaviour, practices and infrastructure to adapt to the impacts of climate change. Reducing emissions is mitigation, which limits how much the climate changes in the future. Adaptation includes growing crops that resist warmer, drier or wetter conditions, improving flood defences, making laws about building near coasts and on floodplains, and changing building design and materials such as raising houses on stilts or using cool roofs. Both are needed: mitigation alone cannot prevent the impacts already set in motion by the greenhouse gases already released, and adaptation alone cannot keep up with the impacts if emissions continue to rise.
Revise this topicClimate Change
A student wrote · Climate ChangeA student wrote: 'Global warming will just make everywhere a bit warmer, so countries with cool climates will get better harvests and everyone will benefit.'
Why it loses marksTemperature is only one of the changes, and the effects are uneven. Rainfall patterns, the timing of the seasons, extreme weather, pests and salinity all change as well, and the losses fall mainly on tropical and subtropical farmers who already farm near the limits of heat and water.
The answer that scoresThe impacts are uneven. Crops in tropical and subtropical regions are likely to suffer because they are already close to their maximum temperature, and drought, flooding, salinity and more frequent extreme weather destroy harvests and soil. Warm winter temperatures allow pests and invasive species to survive and spread. Some cooler regions may gain a longer growing season, but the carbon dioxide fertilisation effect is limited by shortages of water and nutrients, and heavier rain can wash nutrients and topsoil away. Overall, food production becomes less reliable and prices rise, so the poorest households are hit hardest.
Revise this topicClimate Change
A student wrote · Acid RainA student wrote: 'Acid rain is caused by carbon dioxide from burning fossil fuels dissolving in rainwater.'
Why it loses marksCarbon dioxide does dissolve in rain and makes it slightly acidic, at about pH 5.6, but that is natural and happens everywhere. Acid rain is a separate and much stronger effect, caused by sulfur dioxide and oxides of nitrogen forming sulfuric and nitric acid.
The answer that scoresUnpolluted rain is already slightly acidic at about pH 5.6 because it dissolves carbon dioxide. Acid rain is more acidic than that because it also absorbs sulfur dioxide, from the combustion of fossil fuels that contain sulfur compounds and from volcanic gases, and oxides of nitrogen, formed when nitrogen from the atmosphere reacts with oxygen at the high temperature of a vehicle engine. Sulfur dioxide is oxidised to sulfur trioxide and then to sulfuric acid, and nitrogen dioxide forms nitric acid, so the rain can fall below pH 4 and the acid mist on high ground is stronger still.
Revise this topicAcid Rain
A student wrote · Acid RainA student wrote: 'Acid rain only damages the area close to the power station, because the gases fall out of the air quickly.'
Why it loses marksThe gases are released from tall chimneys and can travel hundreds or thousands of kilometres on the wind before they are oxidised and deposited. Most of the damage is done far downwind of the source, very often in another country, which is why acid deposition is called transboundary.
The answer that scoresSulfur dioxide and oxides of nitrogen leave through tall chimneys, which spread them high into the air, and the wind carries them hundreds or thousands of kilometres in a few days. The gases are oxidised on the way, so by the time they reach the ground they may have crossed several borders. That is why the lakes of Norway and Sweden were acidified by emissions from the United Kingdom and central Europe, and why the Adirondack Mountains in New York State were acidified by power stations in the Midwest. A tall chimney lowers the concentration in the town beneath it but does not remove the gas, so it exports the problem rather than solving it, and the only real answer is an international agreement on emissions.
Revise this topicAcid Rain
A student wrote · Acid RainA student wrote: 'Liming a lake solves the acid rain problem in that lake.'
Why it loses marksLiming neutralises the acid that is already there, so it raises the pH and lets fish return, but it does nothing about the acid still being deposited on the lake every year. It is management of the damage, not of the cause, and it has to be repeated indefinitely.
The answer that scoresSpreading calcium carbonate or calcium oxide on the lake or its catchment neutralises the acid and raises the pH, and it does allow fish to breed again, which is why thousands of lakes in Norway and Sweden have been limed. But the acid continues to fall, so the lime has to be applied again every few years, the cost never ends, large doses can harm some species, and it is impossible to lime every stream in a catchment. Liming is a holding measure that buys time until emission controls reduce the deposition, and the permanent solution is to cut the sulfur dioxide and oxides of nitrogen at their sources.
Revise this topicAcid Rain
A student wrote · Acid RainA student wrote: 'Fitting catalytic converters to cars removes the sulfur dioxide from vehicle exhausts.'
Why it loses marksA catalytic converter works on the gases formed by the combustion reaction, converting oxides of nitrogen, carbon monoxide and unburned hydrocarbons. The sulfur dioxide comes from sulfur that was already in the fuel, so the converter cannot remove it, and in fact a converter can oxidise some of it into sulfate particles.
The answer that scoresA three-way catalytic converter uses platinum, palladium and rhodium on a ceramic honeycomb to turn oxides of nitrogen into nitrogen and oxygen, and carbon monoxide and unburned hydrocarbons into carbon dioxide and water. It does not remove sulfur dioxide, because that gas comes from the sulfur compounds in the fuel rather than from the combustion chemistry, so the sulfur must be dealt with by using low-sulfur fuel or by flue-gas desulfurisation at a power station. The converter also needs unleaded fuel, because lead poisons the catalyst, and it only works once the exhaust is hot, so the first few minutes of a journey are uncontrolled.
Revise this topicAcid Rain
A student wrote · Ozone DepletionA student wrote: 'The ozone hole is a gap in the atmosphere that lets heat escape into space, and it is the cause of global warming.'
Why it loses marksThe ozone layer is not a solid lid, so there is no gap in it: ozone depletion means the concentration of ozone has been thinned over a wide area by more than half. The layer also has nothing to do with heat escaping. It works by absorbing ultraviolet radiation; global warming is caused by greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide and methane absorbing and re-emitting infrared (heat) radiation.
The answer that scoresOzone depletion is the thinning of the ozone layer in the lower stratosphere, mainly by chlorine released from CFCs, so that more ultraviolet radiation reaches the surface. It is not a hole through which heat escapes and it does not cause global warming. The two problems are separate: ozone depletion is about ultraviolet radiation and is caused by CFCs; global warming is about infrared radiation and is caused by greenhouse gases. They overlap only slightly - CFCs and HFCs are also greenhouse gases, and a thinner ozone layer over the Antarctic changes the winds of the Southern Hemisphere.
Revise this topicOzone Depletion
A student wrote · Ozone DepletionA student wrote: 'Each CFC molecule destroys one molecule of ozone, so the damage stops as soon as the CFCs have been used up.'
Why it loses marksThe destruction is catalytic, not one for one. Ultraviolet radiation releases a chlorine atom, and the atom is returned unchanged at the end of each cycle, so it can destroy ozone again and again. The CFC molecule is destroyed when the chlorine is released, but the chlorine is not, and each atom accounts for many thousands of ozone molecules.
The answer that scoresUV radiation breaks the carbon-chlorine bond in a CFC and releases a chlorine atom. That atom takes an oxygen atom from an ozone molecule, forming ClO and O2, and the ClO then takes a spare oxygen atom and becomes a chlorine atom again. Because the chlorine is regenerated it acts as a catalyst, and it goes on destroying ozone until it reacts to form a reservoir compound such as HCl or ClONO2. That is why a small mass of CFC causes damage out of all proportion to its size.
Revise this topicOzone Depletion
A student wrote · Ozone DepletionA student wrote: 'CFCs have been banned, so the ozone layer has recovered and the problem is solved.'
Why it loses marksThe ban stops new CFCs being released, which is a huge achievement, but it does nothing about the CFCs already in the stratosphere or sealed inside old equipment. CFCs have atmospheric lifetimes of many decades, so the chlorine stays and goes on destroying ozone long after emissions stop, and the layer is only expected to return to its pre-1980 state around the middle of this century.
The answer that scoresThe Montreal Protocol has reduced emissions sharply, and stratospheric chlorine has been falling since it peaked in the late 1990s, but recovery is slow. It is expected to be complete around the middle of the century, with the Antarctic hole last, and it can be delayed by natural variation such as a large volcanic eruption. Recovery also depends on finishing the job: phasing out HCFCs and HFCs, and recovering and destroying the CFCs still held in old fridges, air conditioners and foams instead of letting them leak.
Revise this topicOzone Depletion
A student wrote · Ozone DepletionA student wrote: 'HFCs are the perfect replacement for CFCs because they do not damage the environment, and every country stopped using CFCs on the same date when the Montreal Protocol was signed.'
Why it loses marksHFCs are indeed harmless to ozone, because they contain no chlorine - but they are powerful greenhouse gases, so they shift the damage from one problem to another. And the treaty did not impose one date on everyone: developing countries were given longer timetables and received money and technical help through the Multilateral Fund, because an immediate worldwide ban would have been unfair and unenforceable.
The answer that scoresAlternatives must be judged on both ozone and climate. HCFCs contain chlorine and still deplete ozone, although far less than CFCs, so they are only transitional. HFCs contain no chlorine and do not deplete ozone, but they are strong greenhouse gases, so the Kigali Amendment of 2016 added a timetable to phase them down. Hydrocarbons such as butane and propane, ammonia, carbon dioxide and the newer hydrofluoroolefins avoid both problems but introduce others: hydrocarbons are flammable, ammonia is toxic, and high-pressure carbon dioxide systems need redesigned equipment and retrained technicians. The Montreal Protocol itself uses different timetables and finance for developing countries, which is part of why it works.
Revise this topicOzone Depletion

Ecosystems, Biodiversity and Fieldwork

A student wrote · EcosystemsA student wrote: 'Only about 10% of the energy is passed to the next trophic level because the other 90% is destroyed.'
Why it loses marksEnergy is never destroyed - the conservation of energy says it can only be transferred. The 90% is transferred to the surroundings, mostly as heat from respiration, and is also lost in waste and in parts of the organism that are not eaten at all.
The answer that scoresAbout 90% of the energy is lost during the life processes of the organisms: movement, respiration, digestion and excretion. Respiration releases most of it as heat to the surroundings, so it is no longer available to the next trophic level, and further energy is locked in parts that are not eaten, such as roots, bones, hair and shells.
Revise this topicEcosystems
A student wrote · EcosystemsA student wrote: 'The niche of an organism is the place where it lives.'
Why it loses marksThat is the habitat. The niche is the role the organism plays in the ecosystem, so it includes what it eats, where and when it feeds and what eats it. Two species may share a habitat, but they cannot share exactly the same niche for long.
The answer that scoresThe habitat is the place where the organism lives, such as the mud at the bottom of a pond. The niche is its role in the ecosystem: what it feeds on, where and when it feeds, how it reproduces and what preys on it. Two species with identical niches in the same habitat will compete, and one will out-compete the other.
Revise this topicEcosystems
A student wrote · EcosystemsA student wrote: 'An ecological pyramid always has its widest bar at the bottom, because there are always more producers than consumers.'
Why it loses marksThat is only true of a pyramid of numbers in some habitats. A pyramid of numbers can be inverted when one large producer supports many small consumers, and a pyramid of biomass can be inverted in a sea at one moment in time.
The answer that scoresA pyramid of numbers can be inverted: a single oak tree supports thousands of insects, so the bar for the producers is narrower than the bar above it. A pyramid of biomass can also be inverted in a sea, because the phytoplankton are eaten as fast as they reproduce, so the mass of the consumers present at that instant is greater than the mass of the microscopic producers. Only a pyramid of energy is always a true pyramid, because energy is lost at every step and can never increase up the levels.
Revise this topicEcosystems
A student wrote · EcosystemsA student wrote: 'The producer in a food chain stores 30 000 kJ, so the secondary consumer contains 10% of that, which is 3 000 kJ.'
Why it loses marksThe 10% is passed at every step, not once. The primary consumer takes 10% of the producer's energy, and the secondary consumer takes 10% of what the primary consumer received, so the loss is applied twice.
The answer that scoresProducer 30 000 kJ -> primary consumer 10% of 30 000 = 3 000 kJ -> secondary consumer 10% of 3 000 = 300 kJ. Applying the 10% at each step is why food chains are usually short: after four or five trophic levels almost none of the original energy is left.
Revise this topicEcosystems
A student wrote · Forest EcosystemsA student wrote: 'Cutting down trees makes rivers flood because a forest makes less rain fall, so without it there is a lot more rain and the rivers overflow.'
Why it loses marksDeforestation does not increase local rainfall; it changes what happens to the rain that falls. The gain in discharge comes from the loss of interception and infiltration, not from extra rain, and in fact the loss of transpiration tends to reduce rainfall downwind.
The answer that scoresRemoving the forest removes the canopy that intercepts rainfall and the litter and roots that keep the soil open. Less water infiltrates and more runs over the surface, so much more of the same rainfall reaches the river, and it reaches it faster, which makes the flood peak higher and sooner. The soil washed off the slopes settles in the channel as silt, raising the bed and reducing the capacity of the river, so it overflows more often. Flow in the dry season falls, because less water was stored in the soil during the wet season.
Revise this topicForest Ecosystems
A student wrote · Forest EcosystemsA student wrote: 'Light increases as you go down through a forest, so the understorey and the forest floor are the brightest layers.'
Why it loses marksLight is greatest at the top of the forest, not at the bottom. The emergents and then the canopy take most of the sunlight, and only a small fraction reaches the layers below, which is exactly why the forest is layered as it is.
The answer that scoresLight decreases sharply from the top of the forest downwards. The emergents stand in full sunlight, the canopy below them catches most of what is left, the understorey receives only dim, dappled light, and the forest floor receives very little. Plants in the lower layers are shade-tolerant ferns, mosses and seedlings, and they grow quickly only when a gap opens in the canopy above them.
Revise this topicForest Ecosystems
A student wrote · Forest EcosystemsA student wrote: 'Sustainable management of forests means protecting the forest completely, so that no trees are ever cut down.'
Why it loses marksSustainable management is about balance, not a total ban. The definition requires the needs of the environment, wildlife and humans to be balanced while the forest is conserved for future generations, which allows harvesting at a rate the forest can replace.
The answer that scoresSustainable management of forests means balancing the needs of the environment, wildlife and humans while conserving forests for future generations. Trees may be harvested, but only at a rate that the forest can replace, so that the carbon store, the water cycle, the soil, the biodiversity and the products people need are all still there for the next generation. Total protection is one strategy within sustainable management, but it is not the same thing, and it can fail if local people lose their livelihoods.
Revise this topicForest Ecosystems
A student wrote · Forest EcosystemsA student wrote: 'Selective logging is always sustainable, because only a few mature trees are taken and the forest is left standing.'
Why it loses marksSelective logging is gentler than clear felling, but it is not automatically sustainable. The haul roads, the machinery and the timber dragging damage the remaining trees, seedlings and soil, the gaps let in light and wind, and in remote concessions the felling is often not checked, so more is taken than the plan allows.
The answer that scoresSelective logging can be sustainable only if it is planned and enforced: the roads and extraction routes are kept to a minimum, the damage to the remaining trees and soil is small enough for the canopy to close again, and enough seed trees are left for the forest to regenerate. Its limitations are that machinery and haul roads still damage the forest that is left, that the species that need shade are harmed by the new gaps in the canopy, and that illegal felling is very difficult to control in remote areas where there is no supervision.
Revise this topicForest Ecosystems
A student wrote · Managing BiodiversityA student wrote: 'Biodiversity means the number of different species living in an area.'
Why it loses marksThat is species richness, which is only one of the three levels. Biodiversity also includes the genetic variation within each species and the range of different ecosystems or habitats in the area.
The answer that scoresBiodiversity is the variety of living organisms. It has three levels: genetic diversity, which is the variation between individuals of a species; species diversity, which is the number of species and how abundant each one is; and ecosystem diversity, which is the range of habitats and the processes going on in them. A single-species pine plantation is green, but it holds far less biodiversity than the mixed forest it replaced, because both the species diversity and the genetic diversity have collapsed.
Revise this topicManaging Biodiversity
A student wrote · Managing BiodiversityA student wrote: 'When forest is cleared for farmland, only the species that lived where the trees were cut are affected.'
Why it loses marksClearance also splits the remaining forest into isolated patches, and that fragmentation damages species that were never touched by the chainsaw. Edge effects, inbreeding in small populations and the loss of movement between patches all follow.
The answer that scoresThe remaining forest is broken into small patches surrounded by farmland the species cannot cross. Each patch holds a smaller population, which loses genetic variation through inbreeding and is more easily wiped out by disease, fire or a storm. The edges of the patches are drier, brighter and windier and are open to predators and weeds from the fields, so species that need the sheltered interior disappear. Because individuals can no longer move between patches, a patch that loses a species cannot be recolonised, and species cannot shift their range as the climate warms.
Revise this topicManaging Biodiversity
A student wrote · Managing BiodiversityA student wrote: 'CITES has banned the trade in endangered species, so the poaching of elephants and rhinoceroses has stopped.'
Why it loses marksCITES bans commercial international trade in Appendix I species only. It does not cover trade inside a country, killing for a domestic market, or species listed in the other appendices, and it can work only where customs officers and rangers enforce it.
The answer that scoresCITES regulates international trade. Appendix I species cannot be traded commercially; Appendix II species can be traded only with an export permit from the country of origin showing that the export will not harm the species; Appendix III species are controlled at the request of one country. Poaching continues because much of the demand is met through domestic markets and smuggling across poorly controlled borders, permits and paperwork can be forged, and enforcement depends on customs officers and patrol budgets. A ban can also raise the price of illegal horn and ivory, which makes poaching more profitable.
Revise this topicManaging Biodiversity
A student wrote · Managing BiodiversityA student wrote: 'A seed bank conserves a rainforest, because it stores the seeds of rainforest trees.'
Why it loses marksA seed bank conserves genes, not a habitat. The forest, its soil, its pollinators, its decomposers and its rainfall are not saved with the seed, and many tropical trees have seeds that cannot be dried and frozen at all.
The answer that scoresA seed bank is ex-situ conservation: it stores the seeds of a species, and the genetic variation they carry, in a cold dry store where they can survive for decades. It does not conserve the ecosystem, so a species restored from a bank still needs somewhere to grow, with its pollinators, its soil and the right climate. Species with recalcitrant seeds, such as oaks and many rainforest trees, cannot be stored this way. The seeds must also be germinated, grown and re-harvested at intervals to stay viable, which costs money for ever, and a bank is useful only if its material is actually used for reintroduction.
Revise this topicManaging Biodiversity
A student wrote · Fieldwork InvestigationsA student wrote: 'I placed my quadrats in the parts of the field where the clover was growing thickest, so that the sample would show how much clover there is.'
Why it loses marksChoosing where to place the quadrats by judgement is biased sampling. It measures the clover you can see, not the clover in the field, and it over-estimates both the cover and the frequency, so the figure cannot be compared with the same field in another year or with a neighbouring field.
The answer that scoresEvery part of the field must have an equal chance of being sampled. Divide the field into a grid, use a random number generator or random number table to give the coordinates of each quadrat, and place the frame there even if the spot looks bare. Then sample enough quadrats to be representative and report the mean and the range, so that the estimate can be trusted and the survey can be repeated.
Revise this topicFieldwork Investigations
A student wrote · Fieldwork InvestigationsA student wrote: 'The daisy had a frequency of 60%, so daisies cover 60% of the field.'
Why it loses marksFrequency and percentage cover measure different things. Frequency is the proportion of quadrats in which the species was found at all, so a species that occurs in many quadrats but covers very little ground in each has a high frequency and a low percentage cover. The statement turns one measurement into the other.
The answer that scoresFrequency = (number of quadrats containing the species / total number of quadrats) x 100, so a frequency of 60% means the daisy was found in 6 of 10 quadrats. Percentage cover records how much of each quadrat is occupied by the species, estimated with a frame divided into 100 small squares. Report both figures, and say which one the investigation set out to measure.
Revise this topicFieldwork Investigations
A student wrote · Fieldwork InvestigationsA student wrote: 'Our pitfall traps caught 47 beetles, so there are 47 beetles in the meadow.'
Why it loses marksA pitfall trap measures the activity of animals near the trap, not the population of the whole site. The catch rises in warm weather when invertebrates move more, falls in cold weather, and depends on the number and size of the traps, how long they were left in place, and how many animals escaped or were eaten by others in the trap.
The answer that scoresReport the catch as a measure of activity, for example the mean number of beetles per trap per night, and use it to compare places or conditions sampled in exactly the same way. If the total population must be estimated, use a method designed for it, such as mark-release-recapture, and accept that even then the figure is an estimate, not a count.
Revise this topicFieldwork Investigations
A student wrote · Fieldwork InvestigationsA student wrote: 'In field A one quadrat contained six species and in field B one quadrat contained three species, so field A has twice the species richness of field B.'
Why it loses marksOne quadrat is a single sample of a habitat that varies from place to place. The result could have been produced by where the frame happened to land rather than by any real difference between the fields, and there are no replicates to show the natural variation and no repeats to show how reliable the recording was.
The answer that scoresSample several quadrats in each field, placed randomly or at fixed intervals, and report the mean number of species and the range for each. Only when the ranges do not overlap, or the difference between the means is much larger than the variation within each field, can a statement about the two fields be supported. The number of samples should be decided after a pilot study of how variable each field is.
Revise this topicFieldwork Investigations

Natural Hazards

A student wrote · Earthquakes and VolcanoesA student wrote: 'Earthquakes happen at a conservative plate boundary because the two plates collide and the heavier one is pushed down beneath the other.'
Why it loses marksCollision and one plate sinking beneath another describe a destructive boundary. At a conservative boundary the plates do not move towards each other at all: they slide past each other horizontally, so there is no subduction, no melting and no volcano.
The answer that scoresAt a conservative plate boundary the two plates slide past one another, either in opposite directions or in the same direction at different speeds. The rough edges catch and grip, so the rock on either side bends and stores strain for years, and when the rock finally breaks or the two sides jerk past each other the stored energy is released as an earthquake. No crust is created or destroyed and no magma is formed, so the only hazard is the earthquake itself. The San Andreas Fault in California and the Enriquillo Fault in Haiti are both examples.
Revise this topicEarthquakes and Volcanoes
A student wrote · Earthquakes and VolcanoesA student wrote: 'The epicentre of an earthquake is the point inside the Earth where the energy is released.'
Why it loses marksThat is the focus, not the epicentre. The two terms are usually worth a mark each, and swapping them loses both.
The answer that scoresThe focus is the point inside the Earth where the rock breaks and the stored energy is released as seismic waves. The epicentre is the point on the Earth's surface directly above the focus, and it usually experiences the strongest shaking and the worst damage. The depth of the focus matters: a shallow-focus earthquake, less than about 70 km down, releases its energy close to the surface and causes far more damage than a deep-focus earthquake of the same magnitude.
Revise this topicEarthquakes and Volcanoes
A student wrote · Earthquakes and VolcanoesA student wrote: 'Most people killed by a volcanic eruption are killed by lava flows.'
Why it loses marksLava is the hazard people picture, but it is also the most predictable: it flows slowly enough for people to move out of the way. Deaths come overwhelmingly from pyroclastic flows, lahars, ash fall, tsunamis and gas.
The answer that scoresLava flows destroy property, farmland and roads and can set fire to buildings, but they move slowly enough for people to escape. The most lethal volcanic hazards are pyroclastic flows, the fast-moving clouds of hot gas, ash and rock that sweep down the slopes and destroy everything in their path; lahars, the mudflows of ash and water that fill valleys like wet concrete; ash falls, which collapse roofs and can suffocate people and animals; and gases, because carbon dioxide is denser than air and collects in valleys and hollows where it can kill, as it did at Lake Nyos in Cameroon in 1986.
Revise this topicEarthquakes and Volcanoes
A student wrote · Earthquakes and VolcanoesA student wrote: 'The Moment Magnitude Scale measures the damage an earthquake does, so a magnitude 7 earthquake will always kill more people than a magnitude 6.'
Why it loses marksMagnitude measures the energy released by the earthquake itself, not the damage. The damage done at a particular place is the intensity, and it depends on the depth of the focus, the distance from the epicentre, the local ground conditions, the quality of the buildings and how well prepared the population was.
The answer that scoresMagnitude, measured on the Moment Magnitude Scale, is a measure of the energy released and is the same wherever it is recorded; it is logarithmic, so each whole number is about 32 times more energy than the one below it. What kills people is how hard the ground shakes where they live, which is the intensity, and that depends on the depth of the focus, the distance from the epicentre, whether the ground is solid rock or waterlogged sand that liquefies, whether buildings were designed and built to resist shaking, and whether there was a warning, a plan and a trained rescue service. A shallow magnitude 7 earthquake in a poor city of unreinforced concrete kills far more people than a deeper one beneath a city of engineered buildings.
Revise this topicEarthquakes and Volcanoes
A student wrote · Tropical CyclonesA student wrote: 'Tropical cyclones form wherever the sea is warmest, including right on the Equator, because that is where the Sun's heating is strongest.'
Why it loses marksThe Sun's heat alone is not enough. Near the Equator the Coriolis effect is far too weak to make the air spiral, so the storm cannot organise into a rotating system, and no tropical cyclone forms within about 5 degrees of the Equator, even though the water there is the warmest on Earth.
The answer that scoresTropical cyclones form between 5 and 30 degrees of latitude north and south of the Equator, not at the Equator itself. They need a sea surface temperature of at least 27 °C, warm water at least 60 m deep, weak wind shear, and a Coriolis effect strong enough to spin the inflowing air into a rotating storm. Latitude supplies the spin, the warm deep water supplies the energy.
Revise this topicTropical Cyclones
A student wrote · Tropical CyclonesA student wrote: 'The eye is the most dangerous part of a cyclone because the air pressure there is the lowest, so people should stay in shelter until the eye has passed.'
Why it loses marksPressure is not wind. The eye is the calm centre, with sinking air, light winds and often clear skies; the strongest winds and heaviest rain are in the eyewall around it. The danger of the eye is that the calm tempts people outside just before the second half of the storm arrives with winds from almost the opposite direction.
The answer that scoresThe eyewall has the strongest winds and the heaviest rain, because the pressure gradient is steepest there, and this is where most damage is done. The eye is calm with the lowest pressure, and the passage of the eye gives a short false lull: people should stay in shelter until the whole storm has passed, because the winds quickly return from the other side.
Revise this topicTropical Cyclones
A student wrote · Tropical CyclonesA student wrote: 'A storm surge is a giant wave pushed up by the wind, so it hits the coast as a single wall of water and drains away in a few minutes.'
Why it loses marksA surge is not a wave. It is a rise in sea level over a wide area, caused by the wind piling water against the coast and by the very low pressure at the centre lifting the sea surface, and it lasts for hours rather than minutes. It is worst when it coincides with high tide, and in a shallow funnel-shaped bay it can be several metres deep.
The answer that scoresA storm surge is a dome of water driven ashore by the wind and raised further by the low pressure, so sea level rises across a long stretch of coast and stays high for hours around high tide. It floods low-lying deltas and coastal cities, drowns people, salts farmland and freshwater wells, and does far more damage than the waves alone.
Revise this topicTropical Cyclones
A student wrote · Tropical CyclonesA student wrote: 'Once a cyclone has been forecast 48 hours in advance, nobody should die, so any deaths are the fault of the meteorological service.'
Why it loses marksA forecast has to become an action to save a life. Warnings save nobody if they do not reach fishing boats at sea, if there is no transport to the shelters, if the shelters are too far or too few, if people cannot take their livestock, or if they do not trust the message. Deaths also depend on the height of the surge, how low-lying and crowded the coast is, the strength of the buildings and the speed of the rescue response.
The answer that scoresAccurate forecasting is only the first link. Effective management needs the warning to be broadcast in a form everyone receives, agreed evacuation routes with transport, shelters that are reachable and stocked, drills so people know what to do, building regulations so houses survive, and rescue and relief teams ready to act. The comparison to use is Odisha in 2019, where the same forecast became a mass evacuation and very few deaths, and New Orleans in 2005, where a good forecast did not make up for people having no means of leaving.
Revise this topicTropical Cyclones
A student wrote · FloodingA student wrote: 'Flooding is caused by the damage that floodwater does to roads, bridges and crops.'
Why it loses marksDamage is an impact of flooding, not a cause of it. Causes are the processes that put more water into the river than the channel can carry, and impacts are what that water does once it has overflowed.
The answer that scoresThe causes are the physical processes - heavy or prolonged rainfall, snowmelt, saturated and compacted soil, impermeable rock, steep slopes and small drainage basins - together with the human changes to the basin, such as urbanisation, deforestation, poor farming practice and the drainage of wetlands. Damage to roads, bridges and crops is an impact that follows the flood.
Revise this topicFlooding
A student wrote · FloodingA student wrote: 'Urbanisation reduces the risk of flooding, because the storm drains carry the rainwater away quickly.'
Why it loses marksThe drains do carry the water away quickly, but they carry it straight into the river. Impermeable roofs, roads and pavements stop rain infiltrating, so far more of it becomes surface run-off, and the drains deliver it to the channel in minutes instead of hours.
The answer that scoresUrbanisation increases flood risk. Impermeable surfaces reduce infiltration and increase surface run-off; gutters, drains and sewers deliver that run-off to the river quickly; vegetation that intercepted rain and used it is removed; and building on the floodplain takes away the ground that used to store the floodwater. The lag time shortens and the peak discharge rises, so flash flooding becomes more likely downstream.
Revise this topicFlooding
A student wrote · FloodingA student wrote: 'A short lag time means the flood will be less serious, because the water has less time to build up in the river.'
Why it loses marksIt is the opposite. A short lag time means the water reaches the channel soon after it falls, so the rising limb is steep and the peak discharge is high, and the river has less time to carry the water away between the rain and the flood peak.
The answer that scoresA short lag time gives a flashy hydrograph: the rising limb is steep, the peak discharge is high and it arrives soon after the rainfall, so there is little time to warn or evacuate people. Long lag times, produced by gentle slopes, permeable rock, deep soil, dense vegetation and wetland storage, give a flatter hydrograph with a lower peak.
Revise this topicFlooding
A student wrote · FloodingA student wrote: 'Building higher levees along the river removes the risk of flooding for good.'
Why it loses marksA levee can be overtopped by a flood larger than the one it was designed for, and it can be breached. It also narrows the channel and raises the water level, so the flow speeds up and the flood peak is passed on downstream; and because people feel safe behind it, they build on the floodplain, which makes the damage far greater when it does fail.
The answer that scoresLevees reduce the frequency of flooding for the land immediately behind them, but they do not remove the risk. They need constant maintenance, they can be overtopped or breached, they carry the flood peak downstream to the next community, and they stop silt being deposited on the fields. They work best as one part of a strategy that also stores water upstream, keeps new building off the floodplain and warns people in time.
Revise this topicFlooding
A student wrote · DroughtA student wrote: 'A drought is when there is no rain at all, so the driest deserts are always in drought.'
Why it loses marksThis loses the mark straight away, because it removes the comparison with normal. A drought is a period of dry weather that is longer or more severe than normal for that place, so the Atacama or the Sahara, which are always dry, are not in drought, while a run of unusually dry months in a normally wet country is.
The answer that scoresA drought is a period of dry weather that is longer or more severe than normal compared with the long-term records for that place. It is defined by the shortage relative to the local average, not by a complete absence of rain, and it can be described as meteorological, hydrological or agricultural depending on whether the rainfall, the water stores or the soil moisture are below normal.
Revise this topicDrought
A student wrote · DroughtA student wrote: 'Droughts are entirely natural, so there is nothing people can do to make one worse or to prepare for one.'
Why it loses marksThis ignores both the human causes and the whole management side of the topic. People make droughts worse by over-abstraction of aquifers, by clearing vegetation, by overgrazing and by rising demand, and they make them milder by storing water, warning people early and using water efficiently.
The answer that scoresThe rainfall deficit is natural, but its severity is not. Pumping groundwater faster than it is recharged lowers the water table, so there is less in store when the rain fails; deforestation and overgrazing reduce infiltration and send rain running off the surface; growing demand from cities, farming and industry means the same dry year causes a worse shortage; and climate change is increasing both evaporation and the frequency of extreme weather. People can also manage a drought by monitoring and warning, by conserving water and by increasing supply.
Revise this topicDrought
A student wrote · DroughtA student wrote: 'The only impact of a drought is that crops fail and farmers lose money; towns, factories and power stations are not really affected.'
Why it loses marksThis answer stays at the first link in the chain. A drought is a hazard that affects water supply, energy, industry, health and migration as well as farming, and the examiner is looking for that spread of impacts.
The answer that scoresDrought has a chain of impacts. Water sources dry up, so cities ration supply and rivers become too low for navigation. Hydropower output falls when reservoirs are low, and thermal and nuclear stations may lack cooling water, so power cuts follow. Factories that need water for processing must cut production and shed jobs, so wages and export earnings fall. Dry vegetation increases the risk of wildfires and drought increases dust storms, both of which reduce air quality and harm health. Where the loss of a harvest destroys the only livelihood, families migrate to towns or across borders, and competition for water and grazing can turn into conflict.
Revise this topicDrought
A student wrote · DroughtA student wrote: 'Drought-resistant seed solves the drought problem, so there is no need to spend money on water storage or irrigation.'
Why it loses marksIt confuses one mitigation measure with a solution. A drought-resistant or early-maturing variety may still produce a crop when the season is short, but it cannot survive a multi-year drought with no water at all, and many farmers cannot buy the seed every season or get the advice and market access needed to use it.
The answer that scoresDrought-resistant and early-maturing crops are one useful measure among several, not a complete answer. They raise yields when the rains are late or short, but a crop still needs water to grow, so they must be combined with water storage, irrigation efficiency such as drip irrigation, mulching and conservation agriculture to keep moisture in the soil, land management to reduce desertification, and early warning so that seed is planted when the forecast is favourable. Improved seed also has to be bought again each season, which many smallholders cannot afford, and the choice of crop has to match what the local market will buy.
Revise this topicDrought

Human Population

A student wrote · Human Population Density, Distribution and StructureA student wrote: 'Country A has 80 million people and Country B has 20 million, so Country A must have the higher population density.'
Why it loses marksDensity depends on the area as well as the population. Country A might be twenty times larger than Country B, in which case its average density could be lower even though it holds four times as many people.
The answer that scoresWork out both: density = population / area in km2. If Country A has 80 million people in 2 million km2 the density is 40 people per km2, and if Country B has 20 million in 250,000 km2 the density is 80 people per km2 - so the smaller country is the denser one. Always divide before you compare, and quote the unit.
A student wrote · Human Population Density, Distribution and StructureA student wrote: 'The pyramid has a very wide base and a narrow top, so this must be an ageing population.'
Why it loses marksThe base of a pyramid shows the number of young children, which is high when the birth rate is high. A wide base therefore means a youthful population, not an ageing one. An ageing population has a narrow base and bars in the 60s and above that are long compared with the base.
The answer that scoresA wide base that narrows quickly to a pointed top shows a youthful population: a high birth rate, a large young dependent group and a shorter life expectancy, as in Malawi. An ageing population has a narrow base, showing a low birth rate, and long bars in the older age groups, as in Sweden or Japan, with more women than men at the top of the pyramid.
A student wrote · Human Population Density, Distribution and StructureA student wrote: 'A country of 60 million people has 24 million dependents. The dependency ratio is 24 / 60 x 100 = 40 per cent.'
Why it loses marksThe dependency ratio compares dependents with the working-age population, not with the whole population. Dividing by the total population mixes the workers in with the dependents and always gives an answer that is too small.
The answer that scoresSubtract the dependents first: 60 - 24 = 36 million people of working age. Then divide the dependents by the working-age population and multiply by 100: (18 + 6) / 36 x 100 = about 67 - that is, about 67 dependents for every 100 people of working age. State who the dependents are, because a ratio of 67 built from children and one built from elderly people mean different things for the government.
A student wrote · Human Population Density, Distribution and StructureA student wrote: 'Net migration for the country was positive because many more people emigrated than immigrated.'
Why it loses marksEmigration is the movement out of a country, so it reduces the population. Net migration is immigration minus emigration, and when more people leave than arrive the answer is negative.
The answer that scoresIf 250,000 people immigrated and 150,000 emigrated, net migration is 250,000 - 150,000 = +100,000, so the country gained 100,000 people through migration. If 150,000 immigrated and 250,000 emigrated, net migration would be -100,000 and the population would fall by that amount, other things being equal. Total population change = natural increase + net migration.
A student wrote · Human Population SizeA student wrote: 'In stage 2 of the demographic transition model the death rate falls, so the population of the country stops growing.'
Why it loses marksA fall in the death rate raises natural increase rather than reducing it. In stage 2 the birth rate stays high while far fewer people die, so the gap between the two rates widens, and that is the period of fastest growth in the whole model. The student has confused a falling death rate with a falling population.
The answer that scoresNatural increase is the birth rate minus the death rate, so if the death rate falls while the birth rate stays high, natural increase becomes larger and the population grows more quickly. In stage 2 clean water, sanitation, vaccination and medicine cut the death rate sharply while the birth rate barely moves, so the gap between the lines is at its widest and the population rises faster than at any other stage. Growth slows in stage 3, when the birth rate finally starts to fall, and the population levels off only in stage 4, when the two rates come together.
Revise this topicHuman Population Size
A student wrote · Human Population SizeA student wrote: 'A country whose population is growing at 4 per cent a year will double in about 25 years, because 100 divided by 4 is 25.'
Why it loses marksThat method treats growth as if it were added to the population in a straight line. Growth compounds: the population is multiplied by 1.04 each year, and each year the 4 per cent is taken on a larger total, so the population doubles sooner than the linear estimate suggests.
The answer that scoresUse the rule of 70: doubling time is about 70 divided by the annual percentage growth rate, so 70 / 4 = 17.5, about 18 years. The compounding also works the other way, which is why the world population is not growing as fast as many candidates assume: the growth rate peaked at a little over 2 per cent a year in the late 1960s, so the doubling time then was about 35 years, and with a growth rate now below 1 per cent a year it is much longer. Still, an 18-year doubling time is fast enough that a country growing at 4 per cent a year would increase its population eightfold in about 54 years.
Revise this topicHuman Population Size
A student wrote · Human Population SizeA student wrote: 'Stage 3 is the stage of fastest population growth, because that is when the birth rate is falling fastest.'
Why it loses marksThe rate of population growth depends on the size of the gap between the birth rate and the death rate, not on how fast either one is changing. The gap is widest in stage 2, where the death rate has fallen and the birth rate has not; by stage 3 the birth rate is falling too, so the gap is narrowing and growth is slowing even though the population is still rising.
The answer that scoresIn stage 2 the death rate falls steeply and the birth rate stays high, so natural increase reaches its maximum and the population curve is at its steepest. In stage 3 the birth rate falls as girls stay longer in school and contraception spreads, so the gap narrows and the rate of growth slows - but the population still rises, often by a great deal, because the birth rate remains well above the death rate. The population stops growing only in stage 4, when the two rates meet at a low level.
Revise this topicHuman Population Size
A student wrote · Human Population SizeA student wrote: 'Cities grow mainly because birth rates in cities are higher than in the countryside, so most of the increase in urban population is natural increase.'
Why it loses marksBirth rates are usually lower in cities than in rural areas, because children cost more and women are more likely to be educated and in paid work. The main reason a city grows quickly is in-migration from the countryside, together with the reclassification of land as the built-up area spreads outwards.
The answer that scoresRural to urban migration is the main cause of urban growth, driven by push factors such as low farm income and land shortage and by pull factors such as jobs, schools and clinics. Natural increase does add to the total, and it becomes more important over time because the people who migrate are young and are starting their families, and cities also grow when surrounding land is reclassified as urban. The three causes should be given in that order, with migration first, and urbanisation should be defined as the rising proportion of a population that lives in towns and cities.
Revise this topicHuman Population Size
A student wrote · Managing Human Population SizeA student wrote: 'A pro-natalist policy is one that tries to stop people from having children, and an anti-natalist policy tries to encourage them.'
Why it loses marksThe two terms have been reversed. Both come from the Latin word for birth: pro-natalist policies are in favour of births and anti-natalist policies work against them. Every detail that follows in the answer will be wrong if the direction is wrong.
The answer that scoresAn anti-natalist policy tries to reduce the birth rate, using incentives for small families, disincentives such as fines, or legal limits on the number of children, as in China's one-child policy. A pro-natalist policy tries to increase the birth rate, using baby bonuses, family allowances, tax allowances, subsidised childcare and parental leave, as in France, Japan and Singapore.
A student wrote · Managing Human Population SizeA student wrote: 'China's one-child policy reduced China's population.'
Why it loses marksThe policy slowed the rate of growth; it did not make the population smaller. China's population continued to grow throughout the period of the policy, because there were already so many young people of childbearing age, an effect called population momentum.
The answer that scoresThe one-child policy reduced the birth rate and slowed the growth of the population, but the population still grew, because the large number of people already born went on having children. The policy's real effects were on the structure of the population: a badly unbalanced sex ratio because families preferred sons, and rapid ageing, so that one adult may now support two parents and four grandparents. When the policy was relaxed to two children in 2015 and three in 2021, the birth rate did not recover.
A student wrote · Managing Human Population SizeA student wrote: 'Improving healthcare in a country will reduce its population, because fewer people will be ill.'
Why it loses marksHealthcare lowers the death rate, and that makes the population grow faster, not slower, as long as the birth rate stays high. The fall in the birth rate, if it comes at all, arrives a generation later, once parents trust that their children will survive.
The answer that scoresVaccination, maternal care, clean water and treatment of disease lower the death rate, particularly among young children, so more people survive and the population grows faster while the birth rate remains high. In the long run fewer deaths lead to fewer births, because parents who expect their children to live no longer need to have extra children as insurance for their old age, but this takes a generation and depends on family planning and education being available at the same time.
A student wrote · Managing Human Population SizeA student wrote: 'Making contraception free is all a country needs to do to lower its birth rate.'
Why it loses marksFree contraception removes only one barrier, the cost. Distance to a clinic, shortages of supplies, religious and cultural objections, a husband's refusal and a woman's lack of a say in her own household can all prevent use, and none of these is solved by making the pill free.
The answer that scoresFree contraception raises use and lowers the birth rate, but only if the supply actually reaches the people who need it and they are free to use it. Family planning works best when it is combined with girls' education, which raises the age of marriage, with healthcare, which makes parents confident that their children will survive, and with advice given by someone the community trusts. Iran and Thailand both lowered fertility quickly with a combination of cheap supplies, local health workers and education, and Iran's programme later lost ground when the government withdrew its support.