Exam practice

Why did I lose the mark?

Every entry below is a realistic student answer that scores badly, the precise reason it loses marks, and the version that scores. Read these before your exam — recognising your own habit here is worth more than another hour of reading notes.

AS Level content

A student wrote · Water: particle theory, solubility, density and pressureA student wrote: 'Ice floats because it is a solid, and solids are usually less dense than liquids, and the cold water underneath is heavy.'
Why it loses marksSolids are usually denser than their liquids - water is the exception, not an example of the rule. Ice floats because hydrogen bonds hold the water molecules in a fixed open lattice with large spaces between them, so a given volume of ice contains fewer molecules than the same volume of water. The temperature of the water underneath has nothing to do with it.
The answer that scoresIn ice, each water molecule is hydrogen bonded to four neighbouring molecules, and those bonds hold the molecules at fixed distances apart, building an open lattice with large empty spaces in it. When ice melts, the lattice collapses and the molecules pack more closely together, so liquid water contains more mass in the same volume than ice does. Ice therefore has a lower density (about 917 kg m-3) than sea water (about 1025 kg m-3) and floats. Because the ice floats, it forms a layer on the surface that insulates the water beneath from the cold air, and it provides a habitat on its underside for ice algae and the animals that graze on them.
A student wrote · Water: particle theory, solubility, density and pressureA student wrote: 'The salt melts into the water, and the melted salt spreads through it to make sea water.'
Why it loses marksDissolving is not melting. Melting is a change of state caused by heating, in which a solid becomes a liquid. Dissolving is the separation of the ions of a solid by the solvent, with no change of state and no heating involved - the ions leave the lattice as individual ions surrounded by water molecules, and they can be recovered by evaporating the water.
The answer that scoresWhen sodium chloride is added to water, the polar water molecules surround the ions at the surface of the lattice. Their slightly negative oxygen ends are attracted to the Na+ ions and their slightly positive hydrogen ends to the Cl- ions. This attraction is stronger than the attraction holding the ions in the lattice, so the ions are pulled out one at a time and become surrounded by water molecules, spread evenly through the liquid. The ions have been separated, not melted and not chemically changed, which is why the solution conducts electricity and why evaporating the water leaves the original sodium chloride behind.
A student wrote · Water: particle theory, solubility, density and pressureA student wrote: 'Warm water holds more oxygen than cold water because the particles are moving faster and there is more room for the gas.'
Why it loses marksBoth the direction and the reason are wrong. Gases are less soluble in warm water, because the dissolved gas molecules have more kinetic energy and escape from the surface faster than they can dissolve back in. Faster-moving water particles do not create room for gas - they drive it out.
The answer that scoresAs the temperature of water rises, the solubility of oxygen falls, because the dissolved oxygen molecules gain kinetic energy and escape from the water surface faster than new oxygen dissolves from the air. Cold water therefore holds more dissolved oxygen than warm water, which is why polar seas are oxygen-rich and why warm tropical surface water holds the least. Salinity has the same effect in the same direction: oxygen is less soluble in salt water than in fresh water. For a marine organism this matters because warm, salty water holds little oxygen at the same time as the organism's metabolism, and therefore its oxygen demand, is highest - so warm shallow water can become dangerously low in oxygen.
A student wrote · Water: particle theory, solubility, density and pressureA student wrote: 'Sea water is a compound of water and salt, with the formula H2O + NaCl.'
Why it loses marksA mixture and a compound are different things, and 'H2O + NaCl' is not a formula at all. Sea water is a mixture: its components keep their own properties, they are present in variable proportions, and they can be separated by physical means. A compound has elements chemically joined in fixed proportions and can only be separated by chemical reaction.
The answer that scoresSea water is a mixture of different elements and compounds - water, dissolved salts such as sodium chloride, magnesium sulfate and calcium carbonate, dissolved gases such as oxygen and carbon dioxide, and organic matter. It is a mixture because each substance keeps its own identity, the proportions vary from place to place and with depth, and the components can be separated by physical means: evaporating the water leaves the salts behind, and filtering removes the suspended particles. A compound, by contrast, is two or more elements chemically joined in fixed proportions, like the water molecule itself.
A student wrote · Water: particle theory, solubility, density and pressureA student wrote: 'Hydrogen bonds are the strong bonds that hold the hydrogen atoms to the oxygen atom inside a water molecule.'
Why it loses marksThose are the covalent bonds, formed by shared pairs of electrons between the atoms within the molecule. Hydrogen bonds act between one water molecule and the next, and they are much weaker than covalent bonds - which is precisely why they can break and re-form constantly, and why water has the properties it does.
The answer that scoresInside a water molecule, each hydrogen atom is joined to the oxygen atom by a covalent bond, a shared pair of electrons. Because oxygen holds the shared electrons more strongly, each hydrogen end of the molecule is slightly positive and the oxygen end is slightly negative. The slightly positive hydrogen of one water molecule is then attracted to the slightly negative oxygen of a neighbouring molecule, and that attraction is a hydrogen bond. It is weak compared with a covalent bond, but each molecule can form up to four of them, they break and re-form constantly, and together they explain water's solvent action, its density behaviour and its high specific heat capacity.
A student wrote · Tectonic processes, weathering, tides and ocean currentsA student wrote: 'Weathering is when waves break down the cliff and carry the rock away, and erosion is when the rock is rotted by salt.'
Why it loses marksThe two definitions have been swapped and muddled. Weathering is breakdown in place with no transport; erosion is removal and transport. 'Carry the rock away' is erosion by definition, and salt crystallisation is a type of weathering, not erosion.
The answer that scoresWeathering is the breakdown of rock in place by physical, chemical or organic processes; the products stay where they formed, so a cliff can be weathered without any rock being removed. Erosion is the removal of that material and its transport by a moving agent - water, ice, wind or gravity. On a coast the two work together: salt crystallisation and freeze-thaw loosen blocks of rock from the cliff, and the next storm's waves erode them away and move them along the shore.
A student wrote · Tectonic processes, weathering, tides and ocean currentsA student wrote: 'The littoral zone is the area between the high and low water marks on an ordinary tide.'
Why it loses marksIt is specifically between the highest and lowest spring tide marks. The ordinary or neap range defines a narrower strip, so the definition loses the mark that turns on the word spring.
The answer that scoresThe littoral zone is the intertidal region of a shoreline, between the highest and lowest spring tide marks - the full vertical range that the tide can reach over the spring-neap cycle. It is covered and uncovered twice a day, so its organisms must tolerate drying out, changing temperature and salinity, and wave action. Examples include rocky shores, sandy shores, muddy shores, estuaries and deltas.
A student wrote · Tectonic processes, weathering, tides and ocean currentsA student wrote: 'Spring tides happen in spring, when the Sun is closest to the Earth, and neap tides happen in autumn.'
Why it loses marksSpring tides have nothing to do with the season or with the distance to the Sun. They depend on the alignment of the Earth, Moon and Sun at new and full moon. The word spring means the tide springs up.
The answer that scoresSpring tides occur at new moon and at full moon, when the Earth, Moon and Sun are in a straight line, so the gravitational pulls of the Moon and Sun act in the same direction and their bulges add together, giving the greatest range. Neap tides occur at the first and third quarters, when the Sun and Moon are at right angles as seen from Earth, so their pulls partly cancel and the range is at its smallest. Each occurs about twice a month, in every season.
A student wrote · Tectonic processes, weathering, tides and ocean currentsA student wrote: 'Chimneys form at hydrothermal vents because the water cools and the minerals dissolve into the seawater.'
Why it loses marksThis is the wrong way round. Cooling reduces solubility, so the dissolved salts come out of solution and precipitate. Dissolving would destroy the chimney rather than build it.
The answer that scoresThe fluid leaving a vent is hot, acidic and rich in dissolved metals, silica and sulfate. When it meets cold seawater it cools almost instantly, and the solubility of the metal sulfides and silica falls, so they precipitate as fine particles. The particles are deposited around the vent opening and on one another, and the deposit builds upwards and outwards into a chimney with a throat through which the fluid still flows. Growth continues while the flow is strong and stops, and the chimney is eventually dissolved or broken down, when the flow shifts or the throat blocks.
A student wrote · Tectonic processes, weathering, tides and ocean currentsA student wrote: 'The water at a hydrothermal vent boils at 350 °C and the steam pushes the minerals up to form the plume.'
Why it loses marksThe water does not boil. At 2 000-3 000 m the pressure is hundreds of times atmospheric pressure, which raises the boiling point far above the temperature of the fluid, so it stays liquid. It is buoyant because it is hot and less dense, not because it is steam.
The answer that scoresVent fluid can reach 300-400 °C, but because it is under the enormous pressure of 2 000-3 000 m of seawater it does not boil; it remains a liquid, expands and becomes much less dense than the surrounding cold water. That density difference makes it rise quickly out of the vent as a buoyant jet. The plume forms where the jet mixes with cold seawater: the dissolved metals react with sulfide and precipitate as fine particles, and the plume rises hundreds of metres before spreading sideways with the current.
A student wrote · Tectonic processes, weathering, tides and ocean currentsA student wrote: 'During El Nino the trade winds get stronger, which increases upwelling off Peru and makes the fishery bigger.'
Why it loses marksThat describes La Nina. In El Nino the trade winds weaken or reverse, warm water spreads east, the thermocline deepens and upwelling is suppressed, so nutrient supply and the fishery collapse.
The answer that scoresDuring El Nino the Pacific trade winds weaken and sometimes reverse, so the warm surface water that is normally piled up in the west spreads back eastwards and the thermocline deepens in the eastern Pacific. Because the wind is no longer pulling surface water away from the Peruvian coast, upwelling is suppressed, nutrient supply falls, plankton production collapses and the anchoveta fishery fails. Rainfall shifts with the warm water, bringing floods to Peru and Ecuador and drought to Indonesia and eastern Australia. In La Nina the trade winds strengthen, the eastern Pacific becomes colder than normal, upwelling and productivity increase, and the rainfall pattern intensifies in the west.
A student wrote · Interactions, feeding relationships and nutrient cyclesA student wrote: 'Commensalism is when two organisms live together and both of them benefit from the relationship, for example a whale and the barnacles on its skin.'
Why it loses marksBoth organisms benefiting is the definition of mutualism, not commensalism. The barnacle benefits, but the whale is neither helped nor harmed, which is what makes the relationship commensal. This single confusion usually costs two or three marks across a paper.
The answer that scoresCommensalism is a symbiotic relationship in which one organism benefits and the other is neither helped nor harmed. In the whale and barnacle example, the barnacle gains a hard surface to attach to in the open ocean, transport across large distances, and a flow of plankton-rich water over its feeding legs as the whale swims. The whale gains nothing and loses nothing measurable, because its skin is thick and the barnacles are small, so the benefit pattern is + / 0 and the relationship is commensal. Mutualism would require both partners to benefit, as in a boxer crab, which gains the stinging defence of its anemones while the anemones are carried to new feeding areas.
A student wrote · Interactions, feeding relationships and nutrient cyclesA student wrote: 'Energy is lost along food chains because the organisms use it up and because the Sun's energy runs out further along the chain.'
Why it loses marks'Use it up' and 'the Sun's energy runs out' are not processes, so no mark can be given. The examiner wants named routes by which energy leaves the food chain, and the Sun is only the original source - it is not the reason energy declines between two consumers.
The answer that scoresEnergy is lost at each transfer for four named reasons. Most is released as heat during respiration, because the energy an organism needs for movement, growth and maintenance is eventually lost as heat that the next trophic level cannot use. Some of an organism is never eaten - shells, bones, scales and tough structural tissue. Some of what is eaten is not digested and is egested in faeces. Some is lost as nitrogenous waste during excretion. Typically only about 10 per cent of the energy is passed on, so the energy content falls steeply at each trophic level, which is why a pyramid of energy always narrows upwards and why food chains are short.
A student wrote · Interactions, feeding relationships and nutrient cyclesA student wrote: 'A pyramid of energy can be inverted, because one large tree or kelp plant can support many small herbivores, so there are more animals than producers.'
Why it loses marksThe example is about numbers, not energy. A pyramid of numbers can indeed be inverted when one huge producer supports many small consumers, but a pyramid of energy cannot, because energy is lost at every transfer and a higher level can never contain more energy than the level beneath it.
The answer that scoresPyramids of energy, numbers and biomass are different diagrams and only the last two can be inverted. A pyramid of energy shows the energy passing through each trophic level per unit area per unit time, and because respiration, egestion, excretion and uneaten parts all remove energy, each level contains less than the one below, so it is always upright. A pyramid of numbers counts individuals and can be inverted: one large kelp plant can support many grazing sea urchins, and a single host fish can carry hundreds of parasitic copepods, so the higher level is wider. A pyramid of biomass is usually upright but can also be inverted in the sea where phytoplankton have a small standing crop yet multiply and are eaten so quickly that their total production is large.
A student wrote · Interactions, feeding relationships and nutrient cyclesA student wrote: 'The surface water of the open ocean is very productive because it is full of dissolved nutrients from upwelling and run-off.'
Why it loses marksThis reverses the syllabus. Surface water in the open ocean has usually been stripped of nutrients by the producers themselves - that is why it is clear and blue. Upwelling and run-off are the processes that replenish the reservoir, and upwelling is characteristic of particular coasts and equatorial regions, not of the open ocean everywhere.
The answer that scoresThe dissolved nutrient reservoir is depleted by uptake into organisms, so in the sunlit surface layer of the open ocean nitrate and phosphate are quickly used up by phytoplankton and locked into biomass. Dead organisms and faecal pellets sink out of the photic zone as marine snow, so the nutrients they contain are released by decomposition in deep water, out of reach of the phytoplankton. Productivity in surface water is therefore limited by the nutrient in shortest supply, and only where upwelling, run-off, tectonic input, dissolving gases, excretion and decomposition return nutrients to the surface does productivity rise. That is why the central ocean gyres are unproductive blue water while coastal upwelling zones turn green and support huge fisheries.
A student wrote · Interactions, feeding relationships and nutrient cyclesA student wrote: 'Adding more nitrate to seawater always increases productivity, because nitrate is a nutrient and nutrients make plants grow.'
Why it loses marksThis ignores the nutrient in shortest supply. Productivity is limited by whichever essential nutrient is scarcest, so adding more of a nutrient that is already plentiful has no effect - and in some water it is phosphate, iron or light rather than nitrate that is limiting.
The answer that scoresProductivity is limited by the nutrient in shortest supply, so adding more of a nutrient that is already available makes no difference. If nitrate is plentiful but phosphate is scarce, adding nitrate will not increase the rate of photosynthesis, because the producers cannot build DNA, membranes or ATP without phosphorus. Limitation can also come from light, which falls with depth and turbidity, and from temperature. This is why nutrient enrichment only raises productivity where the added nutrient is the one in short supply, and why the same addition to an already nutrient-rich coastal water may have no measurable effect at all.
A student wrote · Classification, biodiversity and populationsA student wrote: 'Plankton are tiny animals that float in the sea and get eaten by fish.'
Why it loses marksThis makes plankton a group of animals, when the syllabus defines it as a diverse collection that includes producers as well as consumers, and it misses both parts of the definition - generally microscopic with limited motility, and drifting in water currents. 'Float' also suggests they control their position, which is the opposite of the point.
The answer that scoresPlankton is a diverse collection of generally microscopic organisms that have limited motility and drift in water currents. It includes phytoplankton, which are producers such as diatoms and dinoflagellates that photosynthesise and absorb dissolved nutrients, and zooplankton, which are consumers such as larvae, copepods and jellyfish. Because they cannot swim against a current, their distribution is controlled by the water movement rather than by the organisms themselves.
A student wrote · Classification, biodiversity and populationsA student wrote: 'A shark is a bony fish because it has fins, scales and a lateral line like a fish.'
Why it loses marksFins and a lateral line are shared by both groups, so they cannot be used to classify the animal, and shark scales are denticles rather than the thin bony scales of a bony fish. The answer also misses the two features that actually separate the groups: the skeleton and the way the gills are covered.
The answer that scoresA shark is a cartilaginous fish. Its skeleton is made of cartilage rather than bone, its gills open to the outside through separate gill slits instead of being covered by an operculum, its skin is covered in denticles rather than thin scales, and it has no swim bladder. It does have a lateral line and the same five fins as a bony fish, which is why those features cannot be used to tell the groups apart.
A student wrote · Classification, biodiversity and populationsA student wrote: 'The Simpson's index is 0.66, so 66% of the species in the quadrat are different species.'
Why it loses marksSimpson's index of diversity is not a percentage of species and does not have units. The student has read the number as a proportion of the species list, when the index measures the chance that two individuals taken at random belong to different species, combining both the number of species and how evenly the individuals are spread between them.
The answer that scoresA value of D = 0.66 means the habitat has moderately high species diversity: there is a good chance that two individuals sampled at random belong to different species. The value runs from 0, where all the individuals belong to one species, towards 1, where the species are equally abundant, so 0.66 indicates that several species are present with no single species completely dominating - and it should be compared only with a sample of the same area.
A student wrote · Classification, biodiversity and populationsA student wrote: 'Spearman's rank gave rs = 0.91, which proves that the organic content of the sediment causes the worms to grow.'
Why it loses marksA correlation coefficient measures only whether two variables change together, not why. rs = 0.91 shows a strong positive correlation, and the word 'proves' and the word 'causes' both claim a causal relationship the statistic cannot establish; a third factor could control both variables.
The answer that scoresrs = 0.91 shows a strong positive correlation between sediment organic content and worm density: as organic content rises, worm density tends to rise too. This does not prove causation, because both variables could be controlled by another factor such as the amount of fine sediment or the strength of the current. Only a controlled experiment, in which organic content is varied while everything else is held constant, could show that the relationship is causal.
A student wrote · Classification, biodiversity and populationsA student wrote a key step as: '1a large brown seaweed -> kelp, 1b small green seaweed -> sea lettuce.'
Why it loses marks'Large' and 'small' are relative and overlap, so a young kelp and a large sea lettuce could fit either statement, and the pair is based on size and colour rather than a feature that is present or absent. A dichotomous key must offer two genuinely contrasting, non-overlapping descriptions that work for every specimen.
The answer that scoresA workable pair uses an absolute feature: '1a Plant body with gas bladders along the blades -> kelp' and '1b Plant body without gas bladders -> go to pair 2'. Presence or absence of a structure does not depend on the age or size of the specimen, so the key still works for a small kelp and a large sea lettuce.
A student wrote · The open ocean, coral reefs, rocky and sandy shores, and mangrovesA student wrote: 'Corals are plants because they contain zooxanthellae and carry out photosynthesis, and the reef is a rock formed by the coral.'
Why it loses marksThe coral animal does not photosynthesise - its symbionts do. Corals are animals in the phylum Cnidaria, and the reef is a skeleton secreted by the polyps, not a rock. The error loses marks both for classification and for nutrition, and it usually drags the polyp structure answer down with it.
The answer that scoresCorals are animals in the phylum Cnidaria that live as sessile colonies of polyps. Each polyp has tentacles with nematocysts, a mouth, and a stomach, and it is a consumer that captures zooplankton. Many reef-building corals also live in a mutualistic symbiosis with zooxanthellae, single-celled algae inside their tissues; the algae photosynthesise and supply the polyp with sugars, glycerol and amino acids, while the polyp supplies carbon dioxide, nutrients from its waste and a protected position in bright shallow water. The polyp secretes a calcium carbonate skeleton, and the reef is the accumulated skeleton of many generations of polyps, which is why a reef is a biological structure rather than a rock.
A student wrote · The open ocean, coral reefs, rocky and sandy shores, and mangrovesA student wrote: 'Coral reefs need warm, shallow, nutrient-rich water because the corals need plenty of nutrients to grow.'
Why it loses marksWarm and shallow are right, but nutrient-rich is the opposite of the requirement. High nutrient concentrations favour phytoplankton and filamentous algae, which cloud the water, block the light and overgrow the coral. Reef water is famously clear and nutrient-poor precisely because that is what lets the zooxanthellae receive light.
The answer that scoresReef-building corals need warm water of about 20 to 30 °C, shallow water generally less than 50 m deep, clear water with little suspended sediment so that light reaches the zooxanthellae, and water that is low in nutrients, because nutrient enrichment encourages algae to grow over the coral and cloud the water. Salinity must be fully marine and stable at around 35, so reefs do not form off large river mouths, and there must be hard substrate for the larvae to settle on and moderate water movement to supply oxygen and remove sediment. The requirement for low nutrients is why reefs are found in clear tropical seas rather than in turbid coastal water.
A student wrote · The open ocean, coral reefs, rocky and sandy shores, and mangrovesA student wrote: 'The benthic zone is the deepest part of the ocean, below the abyssopelagic zone, where no light reaches.'
Why it loses marksThe benthic zone is not a depth band at all. It is the sea floor, and it exists under the shore, under the epipelagic zone and under the deepest water alike. Treating it as the deepest layer puts it in the wrong order and makes it impossible to explain why a coral reef floor is brightly lit.
The answer that scoresThe benthic zone is the sea floor itself, from the shore down to the bottom of the deepest trench, so it underlies all of the water-column zones rather than lying beneath them. Its light level depends on the depth of water above it: the benthic zone under a shallow reef is brightly lit and covered in algae and corals, while the benthic zone on the abyssal plain is permanently dark and its animals depend on organic debris settling from above. The deepest water-column zone is the abyssopelagic, from about 4000 m to 6000 m, which is aphotic, near freezing and under very high pressure.
A student wrote · The open ocean, coral reefs, rocky and sandy shores, and mangrovesA student wrote: 'Sandy shores have a low biodiversity because there is not enough food, and the animals there are just the ones that have not been eaten.'
Why it loses marksFood is not the limiting factor in the way this answer implies, and the second half is not a mechanism at all. The low diversity follows from the physical nature of the substrate - unstable, porous, no hard surface for attachment, greater temperature and salinity variation, and low oxygen below the surface in fine sand.
The answer that scoresSandy shores have a relatively low biodiversity because the substrate is unstable and shifting, so nothing can attach to it and the whole community of seaweeds, barnacles, mussels and anemones found on rocky shores is absent. The sediment is porous, so water drains away at low tide and the surface dries, heats and cools, and the variation in temperature and salinity through the tidal cycle is greater than on rock. Below the surface of fine sand the sediment is waterlogged and oxygen-poor, and the abrasive, moving sand damages delicate organisms. Only animals that can burrow, or that keep a connection to the surface with siphons, can live there, so the number of species is small - although the individuals of those few species can be very numerous.
A student wrote · The open ocean, coral reefs, rocky and sandy shores, and mangrovesA student wrote: 'Mangroves get rid of salt by excreting it from their prop roots, which also absorb oxygen from the air to help the tree grow faster.'
Why it loses marksThe roots exclude salt rather than excrete it, and the point of the aerial roots is not faster growth. Prop roots give mechanical support in soft, unstable mud, and their lenticels allow gas exchange because the sediment they grow in is waterlogged and low in oxygen.
The answer that scoresRhizophora mangle has prop roots that grow out from the trunk and branches and arch down into the mud. They brace the tree in soft, shifting sediment where an ordinary root system could not hold it upright, and they carry lenticels so that oxygen can be taken in from the air and supplied to the roots below, which is necessary because the waterlogged mud is low in oxygen. Salt is excluded at the root, where the membranes act as a filter and keep most sodium and chloride ions out so that the tree can absorb water from saline soil, and any salt that does enter is stored in older leaves that are then shed. Reproduction is viviparous: the seed germinates on the parent tree into a long propagule, which drops, floats, disperses and then roots in the mud.

A Level content

A student wrote · Cell structure, movement of substances, gas exchange and osmoregulationA student wrote: 'Water moves by osmosis from a region of low water potential to a region of high water potential, because it moves towards the stronger solution.'
Why it loses marksThe direction is reversed. Water potential is zero in pure water and becomes more negative as solute is added, so the stronger solution has the lower water potential. Water moves towards it, which means from higher water potential to lower, not the other way round.
The answer that scoresWater potential is a measure of the number of water molecules in a solution and their freedom to move. Pure water has a water potential of zero, and adding solute lowers it, so a concentrated solution has a more negative water potential than a dilute one. Osmosis is the net movement of water from a region of higher water potential (less negative, closer to zero) to a region of lower water potential (more negative), through a partially permeable membrane. So water does move towards the more concentrated solution, but that solution is the one with the lower water potential. For example, a marine fish in sea water loses water because its body fluids are more dilute, and therefore have a higher water potential, than the sea around it.
A student wrote · Cell structure, movement of substances, gas exchange and osmoregulationA student wrote: 'Facilitated diffusion uses carrier proteins and ATP to move glucose into the cell, while active transport uses channel proteins.'
Why it loses marksBoth halves are wrong. Facilitated diffusion is passive and uses no ATP, and it can use either channel or carrier proteins. Active transport is the one that uses ATP, and it always uses carrier proteins, because a channel cannot change shape to push a substance against its gradient.
The answer that scoresFacilitated diffusion is a passive process: glucose, amino acids and ions move down their concentration gradient through specific channel or carrier proteins in the membrane, and no ATP is used. It is needed because these substances are polar or charged and cannot cross the phospholipid bilayer. Active transport is different in two ways: it moves substances against their concentration gradient, and it uses ATP from respiration to do so. It works through carrier proteins, which bind the substance, use the energy from ATP to change shape, and release it on the other side of the membrane. A gill cell pumping chloride ions out into sea water, against a gradient, is active transport; glucose entering a cell down its gradient through a carrier is facilitated diffusion.
A student wrote · Cell structure, movement of substances, gas exchange and osmoregulationA student wrote: 'A plant cell placed in pure water will swell up and burst, just like an animal cell, because water enters by osmosis.'
Why it loses marksThe plant cell has a cellulose cell wall outside the membrane. Water does enter and the cell does swell, but the wall is strong and pushes back, so the cell becomes turgid instead of bursting. Only an animal cell, which has no wall, will swell until the membrane fails.
The answer that scoresPure water has a water potential of zero, which is higher than the water potential inside the cell, so water enters the plant cell by osmosis and the vacuole expands. As it expands it pushes the cytoplasm and membrane outwards against the cell wall, and the wall resists, producing an opposing pressure. The cell becomes turgid and stays intact, which is what gives non-woody plant tissue and algal fronds their firmness. An animal cell has no cell wall, so when water enters it swells and eventually the surface membrane ruptures and the cell bursts. In the opposite situation, a plant cell in a solution of lower water potential loses water, the vacuole shrinks and the membrane pulls away from the wall - plasmolysis - while an animal cell simply shrinks and becomes crenated.
A student wrote · Cell structure, movement of substances, gas exchange and osmoregulationA student wrote: 'A tuna is an osmoconformer because it lives in sea water, so its body fluids are the same as the sea, and this is why it does not need to drink.'
Why it loses marksLiving in sea water does not make an animal a conformer. The tuna is an osmoregulator: its body fluids are far more dilute than sea water, roughly a third of the concentration, so it is constantly losing water and must drink sea water to replace it and excrete the surplus ions actively.
The answer that scoresAn osmoconformer is an organism whose body fluid concentration follows that of the surrounding water - the marine mussel is the example, because its body fluids are isosmotic with sea water and it does not regulate them. A tuna is an osmoregulator: its body fluids are much more dilute than sea water, so its blood has a higher water potential than the sea and water is lost by osmosis across the gills. To replace it, the tuna drinks sea water and absorbs the water in its gut, and it gets rid of the salts that come in with it by actively excreting ions across its gills, while producing only a small volume of urine. Because it must hold its internal concentration at roughly a third of sea water, the tuna is also stenohaline - it tolerates only a narrow range of salinity and cannot move into estuaries.
A student wrote · Cell structure, movement of substances, gas exchange and osmoregulationA student wrote: 'A large fish has a bigger surface area, so it has a larger surface area to volume ratio than a small fish, which is why it can rely on diffusion through its skin.'
Why it loses marksThe surface area is bigger, but the volume grows faster than the surface. Surface area increases with the square of length and volume with the cube, so the ratio falls as size increases. A large fish has a small surface for its volume, not a large one, which is precisely why it needs gills and a circulation.
The answer that scoresSurface area to volume ratio falls as an organism gets bigger. A cube 1 cm on a side has a surface area of 6 cm² and a volume of 1 cm³, a ratio of 6:1, but a cube 4 cm on a side has a surface area of 96 cm² and a volume of 64 cm³, a ratio of only 1.5:1. The surface is where gases are exchanged and the volume is the tissue that needs supplying, so a small organism has plenty of surface for each unit of tissue and a short diffusion distance to its centre, and simple diffusion is enough. A large fish has a small surface for a large volume and a long diffusion distance, so diffusion through the skin cannot supply its oxygen. It needs a specialised exchange surface with a large area and a thin barrier - the gills - and a transport system to carry the gases between the gills and the tissues.
A student wrote · Photosynthesis, chemosynthesis and respirationA student wrote: 'Red algae are red because they live so deep that only red light reaches them, so they need red pigment to photosynthesise.'
Why it loses marksThis has the physics backwards. Red light is the first to be absorbed and is gone within about 10 m, so it is precisely what is not available at depth. The pigment is red because it reflects red and absorbs the green light that does penetrate.
The answer that scoresRed algae contain the phycobilin phycoerythrin, which absorbs green light at about 540-570 nm and passes the energy to chlorophyll a in the reaction centre. Water absorbs red light strongly, so red light is lost in the top 10 m, while blue-green light penetrates furthest - to 150-200 m in clear ocean water. Phycoerythrin reflects red light, which is why the alga looks red, but the light it actually harvests is green. This is why red algae grow deeper than green algae, whose chlorophyll a and b absorb red and blue-violet and are therefore restricted to shallow water where those wavelengths are still present.
A student wrote · Photosynthesis, chemosynthesis and respirationA student wrote: 'The light-independent stage is called the dark stage because it happens at night, when the plant cannot do the light-dependent stage.'
Why it loses marksThe name refers to the fact that no light is absorbed directly in the Calvin cycle, not to the time of day. The stage depends absolutely on the ATP and reduced NADP supplied by the light-dependent stage, so it cannot run at night - it stops within minutes of darkness.
The answer that scoresThe light-independent stage takes place in the stroma and does not absorb light itself, but it uses the ATP and reduced NADP made in the thylakoid membranes of the grana. Carbon dioxide is fixed by rubisco, and the fixed carbon is reduced to a simple sugar using the energy from ATP and the hydrogen and electrons from reduced NADP. In darkness the light-dependent stage stops, no more ATP or reduced NADP is produced, and the Calvin cycle therefore stops too once those carriers are used up. So it is light-independent for its inputs but not independent of light overall.
A student wrote · Photosynthesis, chemosynthesis and respirationA student wrote: 'In the light-dependent stage, light splits carbon dioxide to release oxygen, and the carbon is used to make glucose.'
Why it loses marksThe molecule split by light is water, not carbon dioxide. Carbon dioxide is unchanged by light and is only fixed later, in the stroma, by rubisco. Naming the wrong molecule loses the mark for photolysis and usually the mark for the source of the oxygen as well.
The answer that scoresIn the light-dependent stage, light absorbed by chlorophyll a photoactivates the pigment, raising electrons to a higher energy level so that they are emitted and pass along the electron transport chain in the thylakoid membrane. The electrons lost by chlorophyll are replaced by the photolysis of water: 2H2O -> 4H+ + 4e- + O2. The electrons reduce NADP, the protons contribute to the gradient used to make ATP, and oxygen is released as a by-product. Carbon dioxide plays no part in this stage; it is fixed in the stroma by rubisco in the light-independent stage.
A student wrote · Photosynthesis, chemosynthesis and respirationA student wrote: 'The Rf of chlorophyll b was 2.7, so it is chlorophyll b.'
Why it loses marksA value of 2.7 cannot be an Rf. Rf is a ratio of two distances and must lie between 0 and 1. The student has reported a distance in centimetres, or divided the wrong way round, and in either case the pigment has not been identified by the method the syllabus requires.
The answer that scoresRf = distance moved by the pigment / distance moved by the solvent front. Both distances are measured from the origin line, and because one is divided by the other the Rf has no units and can never exceed 1. Carotene, the most soluble pigment, travels furthest and has the highest Rf; chlorophyll b is the least soluble of the four and stays nearest the origin with the lowest Rf. The value is then compared with published Rf values obtained with the same solvent and the same type of paper, which is how each band is identified.
A student wrote · Photosynthesis, chemosynthesis and respirationA student wrote: 'The bacteria at hydrothermal vents get their energy from the heat of the water, which is why they can make food without light.'
Why it loses marksHeat is not the energy source for chemosynthesis. The energy comes from the oxidation of dissolved inorganic substances - hydrogen sulfide, methane, hydrogen and iron - and that is why the bacteria need a supply of both the chemical and an electron acceptor such as oxygen, not simply warm water.
The answer that scoresChemosynthesis is the fixation of carbon using the chemical energy released when dissolved inorganic substances are oxidised. At hydrothermal vents the water carries hydrogen sulfide, methane, hydrogen and iron compounds leached from the hot crust, and chemosynthetic bacteria oxidise these substances and use the energy released to fix carbon dioxide into organic compounds. The bacteria are the producers of the vent community, so grazers such as shrimp and the symbiotic hosts that house the bacteria depend on them, and a food chain exists in complete darkness. Temperature affects the rate of the bacteria's reactions, but it is not the energy source.
A student wrote · Life cycles, sustainable fisheries and aquacultureA student wrote: 'A simple life cycle is one with only one stage, and a complex life cycle is one with many stages, so a whale has a simple life cycle because it is a simple animal.'
Why it loses marksThe distinction is not the number of stages but the presence or absence of a larval stage and of metamorphosis. A whale has no larval stage and no metamorphosis, so its cycle is simple; that is not a comment on how complex the animal is.
The answer that scoresA simple life cycle has no larval stage: the embryo develops inside the female, and the young is born with the adult body plan and simply grows and matures, with no metamorphosis. Marine mammals such as whales and dolphins are the example. A complex life cycle has one or more larval stages that do not resemble the adult, each separated by metamorphosis - a shore crab hatches as a planktonic zoea, moults into a megalopa, and then into a crab. The larva is the dispersal stage, so a complex cycle trades enormous larval mortality for the ability to colonise new ground.
A student wrote · Life cycles, sustainable fisheries and aquacultureA student wrote: 'External fertilisation is better because the fish produce millions of eggs, so more young survive than in whales.'
Why it loses marksMore eggs are produced, but far fewer survive per egg, and 'better' is not a biological category. The two strategies are matched to different levels of parental investment, and the number of surviving offspring may be similar.
The answer that scoresExternal fertilisation in a tuna releases millions of eggs into open water with no parental care. Most eggs are unfertilised or eaten, and the larvae are prey for almost everything larger, so survival per egg is extremely low - the strategy works only because the numbers are enormous, and it fails if the adults are removed before they spawn. Internal fertilisation in a whale gives each egg a high chance of being fertilised and protects the embryo, and the single calf is fed milk and protected for years, so survival per young is very high. Neither is better: external fertilisation is cheap per offspring but wasteful, while internal fertilisation and care are expensive but reliable. The practical consequence is that a high-fecundity fish stock can recover faster than a whale population, which takes decades.
A student wrote · Life cycles, sustainable fisheries and aquacultureA student wrote: 'A quota makes a fishery sustainable because it limits the catch, and the government checks the catch at the port, so no more fish can be caught.'
Why it loses marksThis treats the quota as self-enforcing and ignores discarding, misreporting and the fact that a quota set above the sustainable yield still collapses the stock. It also says nothing about habitat or non-target species.
The answer that scoresA quota is a total allowable catch, ideally set from stock assessment so that the catch does not exceed what recruitment replaces. Its strength is that it is directly linked to the biology and can be checked at landing. Its weaknesses are that it depends on accurate reporting - fish caught over the quota may be discarded at sea, and high-grading wastes the rest - that it does nothing for the habitat or for non-target species caught with the target, and that a quota set too high for political reasons still allows overfishing. It works only alongside mesh and size rules to protect juveniles, spatial protection for habitat, and monitoring and penalties that make cheating risky.
A student wrote · Life cycles, sustainable fisheries and aquacultureA student wrote: 'Benthic trawling reduces fish populations because it catches too many fish, and it also causes pollution.'
Why it loses marksTrawling does remove fish, but the distinctive impact the examiner wants is on the seabed - the physical destruction of habitat and structure - and 'pollution' is too vague to score. The answer also ignores bycatch.
The answer that scoresBenthic trawling drags a weighted net with otter boards across the seabed. It removes large numbers of demersal fish and scallops, including juveniles and undersized fish, and its bycatch of non-target species is high and mostly discarded dead. Its habitat impact is the serious one: the gear ploughs and compacts the sediment, uproots and smashes slow-growing structure-forming organisms such as sponges, soft corals and maerl beds, and flattens the three-dimensional cover that juveniles need, so the nursery function of the ground is lost. Resuspended sediment can smother adjacent reefs and seagrass. Recovery of these habitats takes decades, which is why the damage outlasts the fishing.
A student wrote · Life cycles, sustainable fisheries and aquacultureA student wrote: 'Aquaculture is good for the environment because it means we do not have to catch wild fish, and it is bad because it pollutes the water.'
Why it loses marksBoth halves are unsupported. Farming carnivores consumes wild fish to make feed, so it can increase pressure on wild stocks; and pollution depends on the system - extensive mussel culture adds no feed and no medicine.
The answer that scoresAquaculture reduces pressure on wild stocks only where the crop is low in the food chain or the feed is not derived from wild fish. Mussels filter natural plankton and add no feed, so they substitute for wild-caught protein with very little environmental cost. Salmon and shrimp, by contrast, are fed pellets containing fishmeal and fish oil made from wild-caught anchoveta, sardine and similar species, so farming them can add to the pressure on wild stocks rather than relieve it. Intensive systems also discharge nutrients, faeces, uneaten feed and medicines, which can enrich the water and smother the seabed, while extensive systems discharge very little. Whether aquaculture is environmentally positive therefore depends on the species, the system and the siting, not on aquaculture as a whole.
A student wrote · Ecological impacts, global warming, acidification and conservationA student wrote: 'Plastic is biodegradable, so microplastics are broken down by bacteria in the sea and the problem solves itself.'
Why it loses marksMost plastics are non-biodegradable - no organism makes an enzyme that breaks the polymer chains - so they do not decompose. What happens is physical and chemical fragmentation: UV radiation, wind and waves break the item into smaller and smaller pieces, which is where secondary microplastics come from. The pieces get smaller, not fewer.
The answer that scoresMost plastics are non-biodegradable, so they persist in the sea for decades or longer. They are broken down physically and chemically rather than biologically: UV radiation in sunlight breaks the polymer chains and makes the plastic brittle, wave action grinds the fragments against sand and rock, and wind action moves them across the surface and off beaches. The rate depends on temperature, because these processes are faster when it is warm, so a plastic item fragments quickly in warm shallow tropical water and persists for much longer in the cold, dark water of the deep sea or the Arctic. The result is that one large item becomes thousands of secondary microplastic particles, which are small enough to be taken up by plankton and to enter the food chain.
A student wrote · Ecological impacts, global warming, acidification and conservationA student wrote: 'Bioaccumulation is when a toxin becomes more concentrated at each level of the food chain, so the tuna has the highest concentration.'
Why it loses marksThat is biomagnification, not bioaccumulation. Bioaccumulation is the build-up within one organism over its lifetime; biomagnification is the increase in concentration between trophic levels. Using the two terms as if they are the same loses the mark for both, and the definition is often the first mark on the question.
The answer that scoresBioaccumulation is the build-up of a persistent, fat-soluble substance in the tissues of an individual organism over its lifetime, because it takes the substance in faster than it can excrete or break it down. Biomagnification is the increase in concentration of that substance at each successive trophic level, because a predator eats many prey and retains the contaminant load of every one of them. So mercury released from the combustion of fossil fuels is converted to methylmercury in the sediment, bioaccumulates in the plankton that absorb it, and biomagnifies through zooplankton, small fish and predatory fish such as tuna to the people who eat them, which is why the concentration in a tuna is far higher than the concentration in the water it swims in.
A student wrote · Ecological impacts, global warming, acidification and conservationA student wrote: 'Global warming is making the sea more acidic because carbon dioxide dissolves in it, and acid rain adds to the problem.'
Why it loses marksThe first half is right and the second half is a confusion with a different topic. Ocean acidification is caused by carbon dioxide dissolving in sea water, not by acid rain, and the two are separate processes. The answer also loses the mark for the chemistry, because it does not say what carbon dioxide does in the water.
The answer that scoresCarbon dioxide from the atmosphere dissolves in sea water and reacts with water to form carbonic acid (CO2 + H2O -> H2CO3). The carbonic acid dissociates to release hydrogen ions and hydrogen carbonate ions (H2CO3 -> H+ + HCO3-), and the hydrogen ions combine with carbonate ions already in the water (H+ + CO3 2- -> HCO3-). The hydrogen ion concentration therefore rises, so the pH falls and the water becomes less alkaline, and the availability of carbonate ions falls at the same time. That matters because hard corals and shelled organisms build their skeletons and shells from calcium carbonate, so calcification becomes slower and more costly, and in cold or deep water existing shell can dissolve. Acid rain is a different process, caused by sulphur dioxide and nitrogen oxides in the atmosphere, and it is not the cause of ocean acidification.
A student wrote · Ecological impacts, global warming, acidification and conservationA student wrote: 'Coral bleaching is when the coral dies and turns white, and it happens because the coral is old.'
Why it loses marksThe coral is not dead when it bleaches, and age is irrelevant. Bleaching is the expulsion of the symbiotic algae, so the answer misses the symbiosis, the cause (sustained warm water) and the reason the coral then starves. A bleached coral can recover if the water cools quickly, which the answer makes impossible.
The answer that scoresReef-building corals live in symbiosis with single-celled algae called zooxanthellae, which live in their tissues, give them their colour and supply most of their energy by photosynthesis. When the sea surface temperature stays about 1 °C or more above the normal summer maximum for weeks, the coral expels the zooxanthellae as a stress response, the colony turns white, and because it has lost most of its energy supply it is effectively starving. If the water cools within a few weeks the coral can take the algae back and recover, but if the heat persists the coral dies. Because recovery takes a decade or more, reefs that bleach repeatedly never fully recover, and the loss of the coral also removes the three-dimensional structure that fish and invertebrates depend on.
A student wrote · Ecological impacts, global warming, acidification and conservationA student wrote: 'CITES protects endangered marine species, so joining CITES is enough to save them.'
Why it loses marksCITES regulates international trade only. It does nothing about habitat destruction, pollution, bycatch or domestic fishing, and it only works if the member states enforce it. Overstating what a treaty does is the commonest weakness in conservation answers, and the syllabus specifically asks about the limits of international agreements.
The answer that scoresCITES is the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species, and it regulates or bans international trade in the species listed in its appendices, such as the humphead wrasse and several species of shark and ray. It is valuable because it works across borders and can be enforced at customs, and because it closes the market that drives the trade. But it only covers international trade: a species can still be caught for domestic sale, killed as bycatch or lose its habitat, and none of those is addressed by a CITES listing. It also depends on every member state passing and enforcing the law, funding the inspections and reporting the trade, and many do not have the capacity. That is why conservation needs CITES alongside MPAs, no-take zones, national legislation, ecotourism income and control of invasive species, rather than relying on one agreement.
A student wrote · Ecological impacts, global warming, acidification and conservationA student wrote: 'Fertiliser is poisonous, so the fish die because the nitrate in the water is toxic to them.'
Why it loses marksNitrate is not the direct killer at normal concentrations. The deaths come from oxygen depletion: the nutrients cause a bloom, the bloom dies, and the bacteria that decompose it use up the dissolved oxygen. Missing that step removes the mechanism, which is where the marks are, and the same mistake appears in sewage questions.
The answer that scoresNitrate and phosphate from fertiliser are nutrients, and when they reach coastal water they cause eutrophication. The nutrients allow a rapid bloom of phytoplankton and seaweeds, and when that growth dies the bacteria that decompose it respire and use up the dissolved oxygen in the water. Oxygen concentrations fall until the water is hypoxic, and fish, crustaceans and shellfish suffocate or leave the area, which leaves a dead zone in which little that needs oxygen can survive. The decay also releases more nutrients, which can feed another bloom, and the shading by the bloom kills seagrass, so the habitat and the food web are damaged as well as the water quality.